60ddfbe7   
   XPost: misc.health.alternative, sci.med.nutrition, sci.life-extension   
   From: hubbca2003@yahoo.com.au   
      
   On Dec 28, 3:00 pm, Bob Officer <*.*@*.*> wrote:   
   > On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 07:09:28 -0800 (PST), in misc.health.alternative,   
   >   
   > carole  wrote:   
   > >On Dec 27, 3:10 am, "John H. Gohde"  wrote:   
   > >> Still, I would wager that Carole's brain is working where it counts   
   > >> much better than the corresponding brain of any Science Pscyho that   
   > >> sadly is all too often in dire need of mental health services.   
   >   
   > >Well thanks for that John -- yes, good word you've coined there to   
   > >describe those into the religion of science, often referred to as   
   > >scientism, but science psychos has a certain ring to it.   
   >   
   > Carole doesn't understand that science is not about belief. It is   
   > about evidence and data. Beliefs are dogmatic in nature and are held   
   > to be true, without evidence or even in the face of contradictory   
   > evidence.   
      
   Hey science psycho -   
      
   Belief in science to the exclusion of any other method of discerning   
   truth, is dogma.   
      
   Have a nice day dumbarse.   
      
   --   
   carole   
   www.conspiracee.com   
   "The statement "no statements are true unless they can be proven   
   scientifically", is claimed to be self-refuting insofar as the truth   
   of the statement itself cannot be proven scientifically; the same goes   
   for essentially similar views like "no statements are true unless they   
   can be shown empirically to be true".  -- http://en.wikipedia.or   
   /wiki/Scientism   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)