From: hrubin@skew.stat.purdue.edu   
      
   On 2013-04-10, cloud dreamer  wrote:   
   > On 10/04/2013 8:58 PM, John H. Gohde wrote:   
   >> On Apr 10, 4:15 pm, trotsky  wrote:   
   >>> On 4/10/13 11:30 AM, Jeff Strickland wrote:   
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
   >>>> "Dano"  wrote in message   
   >>>> news:kk42r2$3p5$1@dont-email.me...   
   >>>>> "John H. Gohde"  wrote in message   
   >>>>> news:0a71b927-add1-4968-a9de-45f499b8feeb@d8g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...   
      
   >>>>> YOU cannot blame moi.  I did NOT vote for Obama Salama ...   
      
   >>>>> =========================================   
      
   >>>>> No one did you fucking moron bigot.   
      
   >>>> That was an intelligent and well thought out retort. Good one...   
      
   >>> I'm laughing too!  As if someone can ever hope to reach the intelligence   
   >>> and well thoughtoutedness of "Obama Salama"!   
      
   >>> --   
   >>> Never post something on the internet unless you have a point of   
   >>> reference. You will look like a moron otherwise.   
      
      
      
   >> Impeachment should be in the cards for Obama.  As far as I am concern,   
   >> you can but both Bushs and Obama in prison, as far as I care.  All   
   >> three of them have more than earned it.  Just call it the end result   
   >> of Chicago Politics.   
      
   >> What the Obama Administration has done to this country is   
   >> unfathomable.   
      
      
      
   > Like attempt to give people access to essential health care?   
      
   What is "essential health care"?  And even more important, can   
   we possibly get enough human, not to speak of monetary, resources   
   to deliver it to all?  As I define it, the answer is clearly "NO".   
      
   > Like pull the country up out of a recession that was only months short   
   > of descending into Depression?   
      
   He helped ger us into it, and I am not sure that we have really   
   gotten out of it.  I doubt that anyone else would not have had   
   comparable results.   
      
      
   > Like promote the green energy industry before China and India became the   
   > dominant players?   
      
   THIS has been a complete flop.  King Canute could not control   
   the tide, and so far nobody has found a way to use "green energy"   
   to an extent which would make an appreciable difference.  The only   
   available energy sources to provide an increase in energy use are   
   fossil fuels and nuclear.   
      
   I wish it were otherwise, but politics cannot overcome the laws   
   of nature.  Unlike human laws, they are self-enforcing.   
      
   Now if we encouraged geniuses with ideas to try to find green   
   energy sources, we might get somewhere.  But we do not know   
   how to do it now, and pushing wind or solar is not going to   
   do the job.   
      
   > I could go on and on.   
      
   > You just let yourself be blinded by ideology to the point that it   
   > affects your common sense.   
      
   On the contrary, it is you who is blinded by the ideology that   
   a government can perform miracles.  It is completely limited   
   by the laws of nature, including human nature.  Socialism has   
   been already shown to be lacking.   
   >   ..   
      
      
   --   
   This address is for information only.  I do not claim that these views   
   are those of the Statistics Department or of Purdue University.   
   Herman Rubin, Department of Statistics, Purdue University   
   hrubin@stat.purdue.edu         Phone: (765)494-6054   FAX: (765)494-0558   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)