home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   talk.politics.medicine      talk.politics.medicine      20,955 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 19,653 of 20,955   
   John H. Gohde to vitty guy   
   Re: Better to let the Quacks Mutilate YO   
   15 May 13 12:21:18   
   
   b33a5f1f   
   XPost: misc.health.alternative, sci.med, sci.med.nutrition   
   XPost: sci.life-extension   
   From: john.h.gohde@gmail.com   
      
   On May 15, 2:04 pm, vitty guy wrote:   
   > >> "YES, according to the insanity of the conventional medicine Quacks it   
   > >> is perfectly okay for females to have their breasts cut off. =A0But,   
   > >> THESE women better not take vitamin D cause something bad might happen   
   > >> to them."   
   >   
   > >> The risk for her before surgery with the demonstrated genetic mutation wa=   
   > >s   
   > >> 85 percent. =A0It falls to less then 5 percent of the wider population af=   
   > >ter.   
   >   
   > >> This is evidence based medicine, where is the same to show for this genet=   
   > >ic   
   > >> mutation that any other approach produces any result worth the gamble?   
   > >> There is none, only quack folk tales.   
   >   
   > >> Good we have such as quackwatch to keep tabs on the folk tales.   
   >   
   > >109,000 vicinity of conventional medicine dye each year from properly   
   > >prescribed and administered prescription medications.   
   >   
   > >New born babies are aborted / murdered before they pass completely out   
   > >of the birth canal.  Fear not, a physician has finally been convicted   
   > >of first degree murder on that issue.  :)   
   >   
   > >Better for women to get their breasts cut off, for men to have their   
   > >prostate removed, and for both genders to have sections of their colon   
   > >cut out THEN for people to prevent cancer by taking REASONABLE amounts   
   > >of vitamin D. Physicians don't want something bad to happen to the   
   > >public, after all.  :(   
   >   
   > >ROFLOL   
   >   
   > >If you believe that load of bull, then you fools have my condolences.   
   >   
   > Hmmm, the good old strawman argument.  A search on quackwatch shows a very   
   > positive set of hvit d and its on the benefits of its proper intake and   
   > supplementation where called for:   
   >   
   > http://www.quackwatch.org/search/webglimpse.cgi?ID=1&query=vitamin+d&...   
   >   
   > So our resident bitter old man to whom the world did not come running nor   
   > wikipedia swoon has found a partner in the common sense idea of proper vit   
   > d levels.  It's the folk at quackwatch don't ya know.   
      
      
   LOL   
      
   Would YOU mind repeating your crap, except this time in plain English?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca