Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.politics.medicine    |    talk.politics.medicine    |    20,955 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 19,653 of 20,955    |
|    John H. Gohde to vitty guy    |
|    Re: Better to let the Quacks Mutilate YO    |
|    15 May 13 12:21:18    |
      b33a5f1f       XPost: misc.health.alternative, sci.med, sci.med.nutrition       XPost: sci.life-extension       From: john.h.gohde@gmail.com              On May 15, 2:04 pm, vitty guy wrote:       > >> "YES, according to the insanity of the conventional medicine Quacks it       > >> is perfectly okay for females to have their breasts cut off. =A0But,       > >> THESE women better not take vitamin D cause something bad might happen       > >> to them."       >       > >> The risk for her before surgery with the demonstrated genetic mutation wa=       > >s       > >> 85 percent. =A0It falls to less then 5 percent of the wider population af=       > >ter.       >       > >> This is evidence based medicine, where is the same to show for this genet=       > >ic       > >> mutation that any other approach produces any result worth the gamble?       > >> There is none, only quack folk tales.       >       > >> Good we have such as quackwatch to keep tabs on the folk tales.       >       > >109,000 vicinity of conventional medicine dye each year from properly       > >prescribed and administered prescription medications.       >       > >New born babies are aborted / murdered before they pass completely out       > >of the birth canal. Fear not, a physician has finally been convicted       > >of first degree murder on that issue. :)       >       > >Better for women to get their breasts cut off, for men to have their       > >prostate removed, and for both genders to have sections of their colon       > >cut out THEN for people to prevent cancer by taking REASONABLE amounts       > >of vitamin D. Physicians don't want something bad to happen to the       > >public, after all. :(       >       > >ROFLOL       >       > >If you believe that load of bull, then you fools have my condolences.       >       > Hmmm, the good old strawman argument. A search on quackwatch shows a very       > positive set of hvit d and its on the benefits of its proper intake and       > supplementation where called for:       >       > http://www.quackwatch.org/search/webglimpse.cgi?ID=1&query=vitamin+d&...       >       > So our resident bitter old man to whom the world did not come running nor       > wikipedia swoon has found a partner in the common sense idea of proper vit       > d levels. It's the folk at quackwatch don't ya know.                     LOL              Would YOU mind repeating your crap, except this time in plain English?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca