XPost: alt.tv.pol-incorrect, alt.politics.usa, rec.arts.tv   
   XPost: alt.politics.democrats   
   From: Sh@dow.br   
      
   On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 07:05:38 -0600, First-Post   
    wrote:   
      
   >>	Routine scan done by image technicians in countries where   
   >>people have free health care ?   
   >>	In socially retarded countries, you would have to PAY a doctor   
   >>so he could prescribe the ultrasound. Then pay him again for looking   
   >>at the results. And maybe pay him again for talking about it.   
   >>	No wonder you have third world health statistics.   
   >>	[]'s   
   >   
   >Ultrasound alone does not diagnose cancer.  All an ultrasound or   
   >mammogram does is detect any mass.  Cancer cannot be diagnosed without   
   >a biopsy you ignorant fuck.   
      
   	So you recommend routine biopsies ? Interesting. You must own   
   a team of doctors that do just that. I just gotta love capitalistic   
   medicine.   
      
   >Come back when you actually know what you're talking about.  Which   
   >will likely be never.   
      
   	Yeah, > 30 years as a family doctor, the only ones I missed   
   were the ones that preferred private consults. I can diagnose a high   
   probability of cancer on a physical exam, increase the chance with an   
   ultrasound, and , if the ultrasound is suspect. a mammogram. The   
   biopsy is for confirmation.   
   	I suppose you don't diagnose pneumonia by a physical exam   
   either. Biopsies yield better result$$$$$$$$.   
   	[]'s   
   --   
   Don't be evil - Google 2004   
   We have a new policy  - Google 2012   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)