XPost: alt.tv.pol-incorrect, alt.politics.usa, rec.arts.tv   
   XPost: alt.politics.democrats   
   From: Sh@dow.br   
      
   On Sun, 1 Dec 2013 12:39:26 -0500, "Sid9"  wrote:   
      
   >   
   >"First-Post"  wrote in message   
   >news:egoj99tmh1merdbeds2vt0g5ru67q3n3pb@4ax.com...   
   >> On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 08:54:33 -0200, Shadow  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>On Tue, 19 Nov 2013 05:05:36 -0500, Ubiquitous    
   >>>wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> I'm a breast cancer survivor. I can tell you one of the first   
   >>>> things I thought about when I got my diagnosis was I have to   
   >>>> get right to a doctor.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Where did she get her diagnosis if she hadn't been to a doctor?   
   >>>   
   >>> Routine scan done by image technicians in countries where   
   >>>people have free health care ?   
   >>> In socially retarded countries, you would have to PAY a doctor   
   >>>so he could prescribe the ultrasound. Then pay him again for looking   
   >>>at the results. And maybe pay him again for talking about it.   
   >>> No wonder you have third world health statistics.   
   >>> []'s   
   >>   
   >> Ultrasound alone does not diagnose cancer.  All an ultrasound or   
   >> mammogram does is detect any mass.  Cancer cannot be diagnosed without   
   >> a biopsy you ignorant fuck.   
   >> Come back when you actually know what you're talking about.  Which   
   >> will likely be never.   
   >   
   >You are off subject. It's not the diagnosis it's the cost   
      
   	Lower cost ---> much higher overall detection.   
   	Your comprehension abilities are far too high for this group's   
   (rec.arts.tv) standards. Go and sit in the corner to the left.   
   	[]'s   
   --   
   Don't be evil - Google 2004   
   We have a new policy  - Google 2012   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)