XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa, alt.politics.usa.constitution   
   XPost: alt.tv.oreilly-factor, rec.arts.tv.news.oreilly-factor   
   From: crwlrjeff@yahoo.com   
      
   "Josh Rosenbluth"  wrote in message   
   news:mnrlmd$b4n$1@dont-email.me...   
   >>   
   >> Oddly, the 10th amendment specifically states that if the federal   
   >> constitution does not address a topic, then that topic is the sole   
   >> purview of the states to address. The recent ruling is one where the   
   >> federal constitution does not stake a claim,   
   >   
   > SCOTUS disagreed.   
   >   
      
      
   And THAT is why states rights took a huge hit.   
      
   You are so blinded by this that you do not see the affect of this decision   
   in future years. You completely ignore the unintended consequence of   
   applying the logic here as a precedent to a decision in the future.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)