XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa, alt.politics.trump   
   XPost: alt.radio.talk, alt.politics.republicans   
   From: weberm@polaris.net   
      
   On Wednesday’s Mark Levin show, President Trump is 100% behind the   
   RINOcare replacement plan, which is a combination of establishment   
   Republicans and the Trump administration pushing a massive   
   government program. This plan will create a massive amount of   
   regulation that will have a devastating impact on the economy. They   
   are leaving price hike regulations in place and getting rid of the   
   individual mandate, and then putting in place a 30% fine for those   
   who don’t have insurance and decide to come back in. In addition,   
   there will be tax credits, where the tax payer is going to be   
   subsidizing an enormous amount of money. How will we ever move   
   towards a completive market system for insurers to market to the   
   middle? Also, the government is throwing money at the states to help   
   them deal with high risk pools but it won’t be enough. The   
   Republican plan doesn’t address the cost increasing mandates and it   
   will affect Republicans at the ballot box. Why are the Republicans   
   talking like liberals to get their big government program through?   
   Conservative’s opposition is not based on purism or perfectionism   
   but based on promises to fully roll back the core pillars of   
   Obamacare which are hurting the country. After that, GOP leaders,   
   like Steve Scalise are trying to shore up support for the bill are   
   sending a dire message to conservatives. He’s telling principled   
   constitutional conservatives that they have 2 choices, either you   
   support Donald Trump who supports the American Healthcare Act, or   
   you support Nancy Pelosi and Obamacare. These Republicans are acting   
   like leftists and are creating a false dilemma. Later, Jim Jordan   
   calls in to discuss his effort in fighting RINOcare. Finally, the   
   fact that it was revealed that there were wiretaps on a Russian   
   ambassador is outrageous. Why did the New York Times put a story out   
   there about wiretapping if it wasn’t true? What was the point of the   
   story? It was to create suspicion and a false impression.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)