Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.politics.medicine    |    talk.politics.medicine    |    20,937 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 20,475 of 20,937    |
|    BeamMeUpScotty to Ubiquitous    |
|    Re: Report: Facebook Is Censoring COVID-    |
|    02 Jun 21 09:29:41    |
      XPost: alt.politics.congress, alt.politics.corruption, alt.censorship       XPost: alt.politics.economics, alt.politics.election, alt.politics.misc       XPost: alt.politics.obama, alt.politics.scorched-earth, alt.poli       ics.socialism.mao       XPost: alt.politics.trump, alt.global-warming, alt.conspiracy       XPost: alt.apocolypse, alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh       XPost: alt.infowars, alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intellige       t-life.down-here, alt.politics.guns       XPost: sci.med.diseases       From: NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov              On 6/1/21 4:39 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:       > Facebook is suppressing comments and posts expressing doubts about the       > COVID-19 vaccine to “drastically reduce user exposure to vaccine       > hesitancy,” a new report states.       >       > “Reducing the visibility of these comments represents another       > significant opportunity for us to remove barriers to vaccination that       > users on the platform may potentially encounter,” the Facebook       > documents say.       >       > Project Veritas first reported the censorship after two whistleblowers       > shared leaked documents demonstrating how the Big Tech company is       > testing algorithms to limit the spread of vaccine skepticism. The       > internal memos examined by Project Veritas revealed that the algorithm       > currently affects 1.5 percent of users who question the immunization on       > health authority pages.       >       > The hesitancy comments are divided into multiple tiers with labels such       > as “Indirect Vaccine Discouragement,” “Alarmism & Criticism,” and       > “Borderline Vaccine (BV) Framework” and matched with certain levels of       > censorship carried out by Facebook. Any comments that do not explicitly       > violate Facebook’s community standards, which were recently changed to       > allow discussion about the possibility of a virus leak from the Wuhan       > lab, are “tiered [sic] by potential harm and how much context is       > required in order to evaluate harm.”       >       > “Based on that VH score, we will demote or leave the comment alone       > depending on the content within the comment,” one of the whistleblowers       > told Project Veritas.       >       > Facebook told the New York Post that it “proactively announced this       > policy on our company blog and also updated our help center with this       > information,” referring to a new policy implemented in March that “add       > [ed] a label on posts that discuss the safety of COVID-19 vaccines that       > notes COVID-19 vaccines go through tests for safety and effectiveness       > before they’re approved.”       >       > Facebook, however, did not like that one of the whistleblowers, Morgan       > Kahmann, a data technician at the Big Tech company, raised alarms about       > how the newest algorithm was being used to silence people. Kahmann       > recently went public with his identity after Facebook removed him from       > his office and suspended him.       >       > “What happened was I was at work, and I got a message from my       > supervisor, out of the blue, basically saying ‘go ahead and wrap up       > your area and clean up your stuff, gather your personal belongings, and       > meet me in a meeting room in the lobby of the building.’ They’re       > basically going to have me meet with the investigative team and grill       > me on this whole situation,” Kahmann said.       >       > Before he was forced out of the company, Kahmann reportedly obtained       > documents that confirmed Facebook’s suppression algorithm is live “and       > being implemented globally across Facebook and Instagram platforms.”       >       > : Jordan Davidson is a staff writer at The Federalist. She graduated       > : from Baylor University where she majored in political science and       > : minored in journalism.       >       > --       > Trump won.       >       They support abortion be cause your body is your own property and you       have RIGHTS to protect you from what anyone can make you do to/with it.                     UNTIL it comes to vaccines where it's no ones business but yours what       you do and the Democrats suddenly want to force you to have RNA/DNA       injected that can't be removed and get a VACCINE that isn't a vaccine       but is a DNA injection into your BODY and it's DNA that you can't abort.              Seems odd that Democrats want you to be able to reject DNA injected       during sex and to later abort that DNA but when it comes to the DNA they       want to inject you with, they feel fine about the hypocrisy of telling       you that you have to accept their GOVERNMENT DNA interference and       injection into your body, and they know that you can't ever remove it       even if you wanted to so why then is abortion legal if the Democrats can       force women and men and gays and trans to all keep DNA in their body       that changes your life the same as BABY would change you and a baby is       is a DNA injection that Democrats also say is your choice... why is it       suddenly ok to NOT get pregnant and to then have that DNA ripped apart       and removed from your body? If one DNA can be forced on you for life       why can't all foreign DNA be forced on you for life? It seems there's       a PARADOX in the RULINGS OF THE SUPREME COURT that is suggesting that       our body is ours when it comes to foreign DNA, unless of course they       want to force us to keep a FOREIGN DNA in our body.                     Democrats and their court ruling are destroying America with lies.                     --       That's Karma              *The first rule of SURVIVAL CLUB is*       Never trust what Democrats or Marxists tell you. Make them prove it with       actual verifiable facts and science. And if you didn't find the lie in       what the Democrat-Marxists told you then you didn't dig deep enough. The       *Gruber Doctrine* is the Marxist plan that says it's "to the Democrats       advantage to have a lack of transparency and then lie about everything".       https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G790p0LcgbI                            *The next rule of SURVIVAL CLUB is*       73 - Academia is where Marxists can live in their theoretic bubble and       imagine they have ascended to their Utopia.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca