Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.politics.medicine    |    talk.politics.medicine    |    20,955 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 20,662 of 20,955    |
|    Woke Stupidity to Red    |
|    Re: Johns Hopkins pulls 'lesbian' defini    |
|    15 Jun 23 09:24:37    |
      XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.usage.english, sac.politics       XPost: talk.politics.guns       From: woke_stupidity@splcenter.org              Red <232@gmail.com> wrote in news:t00htv$25np7$74@news.freedyn.de:              > davej wrote       >       >> One lesbian moron after another.... how stupid can you get?              The university's online glossary of LGBTQ terms and identities defined the       word “lesbian” as a “non-man attracted to non-men" before it was taken       down.              Johns Hopkins University removed an online glossary of LGBTQ terms and       identities this week after its definition of the word "lesbian" used the       term "non-men" to refer to women and some nonbinary people and fueled an       online uproar.              Screenshots of the glossary before it was taken down showed that the       university defined the word "lesbian" as a "non-man attracted to non-men."       It added that while past definitions have referred to lesbians as women       who are sexually attracted to other women, the "updated definition" is       intended to include nonbinary people who may identify with the label.              "The LGBTQ Glossary serves as an introduction to the range of identities       and terms that are used within LGBTQ communities, and is not intended to       serve as the definitive answers as to how all people understand or use       these terms," Megan Christin, the university's director of strategic       communications, said in a statement Wednesday. "While the glossary is a       resource posted on the website of the Johns Hopkins University Office of       Diversity and Inclusion (ODI), the definitions were not reviewed or       approved by ODI leadership and the language in question has been removed       pending review."              Christin did not respond to questions regarding when the online glossary       was first uploaded.              Screenshots of the glossary sparked an online firestorm in recent days,       with many women, including some lesbians, calling the definition       "misogynistic" and noting that the definition for "gay man" did not use       similar language, such as "non-women."              "Lesbian was literally the only word in English language that is not tied       to man- as in male- feMALE, man- woMAN," tennis star Martina Navratilova,       who is a lesbian, tweeted Monday. "And now lesbians are non men?!? Wtf?!?"                     J.K. Rowling — who has widely been accused of being transphobic for years       — also chimed in on the matter, tweeting to her 14 million followers       Tuesday.              "Man: no definition needed. Non-man (formerly known as woman): a being       definable only by reference to the male," she wrote on Twitter. "An       absence, a vacuum where there’s no man-ness."              And on Wednesday, Nikki Haley, a Republican 2024 presidential contender       and a former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, called the glossary's       definition "infuriating," weeks after she suggested that transgender girls       in sports are leading to suicidal ideation in teenage girls.              "This war on women has to stop," she wrote on Twitter. "First, allowing       biological boys to play girls’ sports. Now, defining a woman as a 'non-       man.'"              Haley and Navratilova did not respond to a request for further comment,       and Rowling declined to comment further.              The university's glossary represents the latest skirmish in an ongoing       battle over the integration of gender-neutral language, as more people       around the world neither identify as male nor female.              A global survey released by Ipsos this month found that 1.3% of the 22,514       participants — who were surveyed in 30 countries in the Americas, Europe       and Asia in February and March — identify as nonbinary, gender-       nonconforming or gender fluid.              However, new research shows that the majority of Americans do not believe       in gender neutral identities.              A new national poll from Public Religion Research Institute, a nonpartisan       research group, found that 65% of all Americans believe there are only two       gender identities — male and female.              The poll also showed that views on gender identity are deeply divided by       party affiliation. Among Republicans, 90% say there are just two genders,       compared with 66% of independents and 44% of Democrats.              Over the last handful of years, Rowling and others have mocked gender-       neutral terms, including “people who menstruate,” “pregnant people" or       “chestfeeding.”              https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-news/johns-hopkins-pulls-lesbian-       definition-uproar-use-non-men-instead-wome-rcna89307              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca