XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, comp.os.linux.advocacy, talk.politics.guns   
   XPost: alt.transgendered   
   From: me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net   
      
   "Joel"  wrote in message   
   news:ropnfj94b5bmok288ftcrnoerglras27tu@4ax.com...   
   > "Scout"  wrote:   
   >   
   >>> It's [GAC surgery] never done below the age of 16, rarely before 18.   
   >>> This isn't a   
   >>> real problem, just a rhetorical point for the phobes, dishonestly.   
   >>   
   >>Frankly it should be illegal below 18. Under 18 it's child abuse. It is   
   >>unnecessary and purely elective cosmetic surgery.   
   >   
   >   
   > Wrong.   
      
   No, that's exactly factual.   
      
   >   
   >   
   >>If it must be done let the court ordered and the Court will need to pay   
   >>for   
   >>this massively expenses unnecessary elective cosmetic surgery and any   
   >>future   
   >>costs than may result from it.   
   >>   
   >>Between 18-21 I'm not sure how that would work, but if the parents say   
   >>'no'   
   >>then the above conditions above would apply.   
   >   
   >   
   > What do "parents" have to do with people over 18, retard?   
      
   Because in all states 21 is the legal adult age were parents no longer have   
   any responsibly towards their child.   
      
   Now, if you can get all states to agree to 18, then we can lower it, but   
   since you are talking a national policy here, we have to go with the   
   highest.   
      
   I find it interesting that an adult of your asserted superiority wouldn't   
   know that.   
      
      
   >> If they chose to proceed, then   
   >>a Court would have to render an independent judgment for the minor as to   
   >>the   
   >>acceptability of such,  and the parents would have to accept whatever   
   >>current and future costs and liabilities that might exist due to this to   
   >>whatever amount the judge decides. If they don't like that decision they   
   >>can   
   >>still say 'no'.   
   >>   
   >>After 21 the person can mutilate their body however they want as long as   
   >>they can afford to pay for it. The parents would have no legal obligation   
   >>to   
   >>be involved or provide funds to do so nor would they ever be liable for   
   >>such   
   >>a decision or the ramifications of that decision even if taken to court,   
   >>as   
   >>they are now a legal adult and totally responsible for their own decisions   
   >>and the consequences of those decisions.   
   >>   
   >>In short. once you are a legal adult you can make your own decisions and   
   >>assume the expense and results of those decisions.   
   >>   
   >>As a minor, your parents/law decide. If it's a matter of law, then the   
   >>parents should not be liable for any part of it, including monetary.   
   >   
   >   
   > Drivel.   
      
   Legal Fact.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)