XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, comp.os.linux.advocacy, talk.politics.guns   
   XPost: alt.transgendered   
   From: joelcrump@gmail.com   
      
   "Scout"  wrote:   
   >"Joel"  wrote in message   
   >news:ekusfjhmsvgklpo46bcfpnh9dfunue6jkf@4ax.com...   
   >> NoBody  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>>So, *you* won't do "the homework" of checking it out for yourself, you   
   >>>>want me to prove something I already know to be true.  Fuck off and   
   >>>>die, burn in hell.   
   >>>   
   >>>Typical liberal - expect someone else to support or disprove their   
   >>>claim for them because they're too lazy to appear credible by doing it   
   >>>themselves.   
   >>>   
   >>>Finish with a hateful remark and  get the perfect lib.   
   >>   
   >> I'll tell you why what I wrote is that of a "typical liberal" -   
   >> because it was correct, based in knowledge.   
   >   
   >And yet.. you can't support this "knowledge" you claim to possess..   
      
      
   Free hint, bozo, people younger than 16 *by definition* cannot consent   
   to radical surgery like this.  My previous GF had received zero GAC of   
   any kind, but was hot anyway, the idea that GAC is required really is   
   imaginary, in fact in some cases a form of abusiveness.  One's   
   identity as transgender has *nothing* to do with sex hormones or   
   genitalia.   
      
   --   
   Joel W. Crump   
      
   Amendment XIV   
   Section 1.   
      
   [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall   
   abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the   
   United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of   
   life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;   
   nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal   
   protection of the laws.   
      
   Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are   
   liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)