XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, comp.os.linux.advocacy, talk.politics.guns   
   XPost: alt.transgendered   
   From: joelcrump@gmail.com   
      
   "Scout"  wrote:   
      
   >>>> I'll tell you why what I wrote is that of a "typical liberal" -   
   >>>> because it was correct, based in knowledge.   
   >>>   
   >>>And yet.. you can't support this "knowledge" you claim to possess..   
   >>   
   >> Free hint, bozo, people younger than 16 *by definition* cannot consent   
   >> to radical surgery like this.   
   >   
   >Then prohibiting them from having it until they are 21 shouldn't be an issue   
   >then.   
      
      
   Bzzt.   
      
      
   >>  My previous GF had received zero GAC of   
   >> any kind, but was hot anyway   
   >   
   >So you liked his dick?   
      
      
   I like any nice dick, including on men.   
      
   --   
   Joel W. Crump   
      
   Amendment XIV   
   Section 1.   
      
   [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall   
   abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the   
   United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of   
   life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;   
   nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal   
   protection of the laws.   
      
   Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are   
   liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)