XPost: alt.atheism, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.transgendered   
   XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy, talk.politics.guns   
   From: doch@rust.belt   
      
   On 10/3/2024 12:29 PM, Mike W wrote:   
   > In article , me4guns@verizon.rem   
   veme.this2.nospam.net says...   
   >>   
   >> "Joel"  wrote in message   
   >> news:78gtfjppcnk5pvb2s0p8u3vkrkbauekb82@4ax.com...   
   >>> "Scout"  wrote:   
   >>>> "Joel"  wrote in message   
   >>>> news:ekusfjhmsvgklpo46bcfpnh9dfunue6jkf@4ax.com...   
   >>>>> NoBody  wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>> So, *you* won't do "the homework" of checking it out for yourself, you   
   >>>>>>> want me to prove something I already know to be true.  Fuck off and   
   >>>>>>> die, burn in hell.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Typical liberal - expect someone else to support or disprove their   
   >>>>>> claim for them because they're too lazy to appear credible by doing it   
   >>>>>> themselves.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Finish with a hateful remark and  get the perfect lib.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> I'll tell you why what I wrote is that of a "typical liberal" -   
   >>>>> because it was correct, based in knowledge.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> And yet.. you can't support this "knowledge" you claim to possess..   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Free hint, bozo, people younger than 16 *by definition* cannot consent   
   >>> to radical surgery like this.   
   >>   
   >> Then prohibiting them from having it until they are 21 shouldn't be an issue   
   >> then.   
   >>   
   >>>   My previous GF had received zero GAC of   
   >>> any kind, but was hot anyway   
   >>   
   >> So you liked his dick?   
   >>   
   >>   
   >   
   > https://postimg.cc/tn4Mdwk7   
      
   I've seen that picture on a Megan's Law site.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)