XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, comp.os.linux.advocacy, talk.politics.guns   
   XPost: alt.transgendered   
   From: joelcrump@gmail.com   
      
   Governor Swill wrote:   
   >On Fri, 04 Oct 2024 21:09:11 -0400, Joel wrote:   
   >>"Scout" wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>>>> It's [GAC surgery] never done below the age of 16, rarely before 18.   
   >>>>>> This isn't a   
   >>>>>> real problem, just a rhetorical point for the phobes, dishonestly.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>Frankly it should be illegal below 18. Under 18 it's child abuse. It is   
   >>>>>unnecessary and purely elective cosmetic surgery.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Wrong.   
   >>>   
   >>>No, that's exactly factual.   
   >>   
   >>16 and 17 year-old people are not children.   
   >   
   >Two words: Bull shit.   
      
      
   Free hint, claimed governor, I don't need your guidance, I'm the   
   authority. 16 is not in *every* sense, yet, adult, but it is in a   
   number of ways. It's not a child.   
      
      
   >>>>>If it must be done let the court ordered and the Court will need to pay   
   >>>>>for   
   >>>>>this massively expenses unnecessary elective cosmetic surgery and any   
   >>>>>future   
   >>>>>costs than may result from it.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>Between 18-21 I'm not sure how that would work, but if the parents say   
   >>>>>'no'   
   >>>>>then the above conditions above would apply.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> What do "parents" have to do with people over 18, retard?   
   >>>   
   >>>Because in all states 21 is the legal adult age were parents no longer have   
   >>>any responsibly towards their child.   
   >>>   
   >>>Now, if you can get all states to agree to 18, then we can lower it, but   
   >>>since you are talking a national policy here, we have to go with the   
   >>>highest.   
   >>>   
   >>>I find it interesting that an adult of your asserted superiority wouldn't   
   >>>know that.   
   >>   
   >>So a state has some power over a 20 year-old? Fuck that.   
   >   
   >The State has some power over all of us and just because you think the age of   
   >majority should be eleven doesn't mean everybody thinks so.   
      
      
   I never said anything about making the age of majority 11, silly   
   person.   
      
   --   
   Joel W. Crump   
      
   Amendment XIV   
   Section 1.   
      
   [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall   
   abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the   
   United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of   
   life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;   
   nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal   
   protection of the laws.   
      
   Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are   
   liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|