home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   talk.politics.medicine      talk.politics.medicine      20,937 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 20,827 of 20,937   
   "Turegano to Joel   
   Re: 'I literally lost organs:' Why detra   
   04 Oct 24 22:17:40   
   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, comp.os.linux.advocacy, talk.politics.guns   
   XPost: alt.transgendered   
   From: turegano"@x.com   
      
   On 10/4/2024 8:59 PM, Joel wrote:   
   > Governor Swill  wrote:   
   >> On Fri, 04 Oct 2024 21:09:11 -0400, Joel  wrote:   
   >>> "Scout"  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>>>> It's [GAC surgery] never done below the age of 16, rarely before 18.   
   >>>>>>> This isn't a   
   >>>>>>> real problem, just a rhetorical point for the phobes, dishonestly.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Frankly it should be illegal below 18. Under 18 it's child abuse. It is   
   >>>>>> unnecessary and purely elective cosmetic surgery.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Wrong.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> No, that's exactly factual.   
   >>>   
   >>> 16 and 17 year-old people are not children.   
   >>   
   >> Two words:  Bull shit.   
   >   
   >   
   > Free hint, claimed governor, I don't need your guidance, I'm the   
   > authority.  16 is not in *every* sense, yet, adult, but it is in a   
   > number of ways.  It's not a child.   
      
   It's 2024 and they most certainly are.  Kids in this age group are the   
   worst ever raised in this country.  They are social media products and   
   totally fucked in their heads.   
      
   >>>>>> If it must be done let the court ordered and the Court will need to pay   
   >>>>>> for   
   >>>>>> this massively expenses unnecessary elective cosmetic surgery and any   
   >>>>>> future   
   >>>>>> costs than may result from it.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Between 18-21 I'm not sure how that would work, but if the parents say   
   >>>>>> 'no'   
   >>>>>> then the above conditions above would apply.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> What do "parents" have to do with people over 18, retard?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Because in all states 21 is the legal adult age were parents no longer   
   have   
   >>>> any responsibly towards their child.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Now, if you can get all states to agree to 18, then we can lower it, but   
   >>>> since you are talking a national policy here, we have to go with the   
   >>>> highest.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I find it interesting that an adult of your asserted superiority wouldn't   
   >>>> know that.   
   >>>   
   >>> So a state has some power over a 20 year-old?  Fuck that.   
   >>   
   >> The State has some power over all of us and just because you think the age   
   of   
   >> majority should be eleven doesn't mean everybody thinks so.   
   >   
   >   
   > I never said anything about making the age of majority 11, silly   
   > person.   
      
   But you think about it, that's why you picked 11 specifically.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca