XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, comp.os.linux.advocacy, talk.politics.guns   
   XPost: alt.transgendered   
   From: joelcrump@gmail.com   
      
   "Turegano On 10/4/2024 8:59 PM, Joel wrote:   
   >> Governor Swill  wrote:   
   >>> On Fri, 04 Oct 2024 21:09:11 -0400, Joel  wrote:   
   >>>> "Scout"  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>>> It's [GAC surgery] never done below the age of 16, rarely before 18.   
   >>>>>>>> This isn't a   
   >>>>>>>> real problem, just a rhetorical point for the phobes, dishonestly.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Frankly it should be illegal below 18. Under 18 it's child abuse. It is   
   >>>>>>> unnecessary and purely elective cosmetic surgery.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Wrong.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> No, that's exactly factual.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> 16 and 17 year-old people are not children.   
   >>>   
   >>> Two words:  Bull shit.   
   >>   
   >> Free hint, claimed governor, I don't need your guidance, I'm the   
   >> authority.  16 is not in *every* sense, yet, adult, but it is in a   
   >> number of ways.  It's not a child.   
   >   
   >It's 2024 and they most certainly are.  Kids in this age group are the   
   >worst ever raised in this country.  They are social media products and   
   >totally fucked in their heads.   
      
      
   Whatever ...   
      
      
   >>>> So a state has some power over a 20 year-old?  Fuck that.   
   >>>   
   >>> The State has some power over all of us and just because you think the age   
   of   
   >>> majority should be eleven doesn't mean everybody thinks so.   
   >>   
   >> I never said anything about making the age of majority 11, silly   
   >> person.   
   >   
   >But you think about it, that's why you picked 11 specifically.   
      
      
   I never brought up anything about it, Swill did, it's right there in   
   the quoting, he spelled it as a word rather than typing it as a   
   numeral.   
      
   --   
   Joel W. Crump   
      
   Amendment XIV   
   Section 1.   
      
   [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall   
   abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the   
   United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of   
   life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;   
   nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal   
   protection of the laws.   
      
   Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are   
   liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)