XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, comp.os.linux.advocacy, talk.politics.guns   
   XPost: alt.transgendered   
   From: NoBody@nowhere.com   
      
   On Fri, 04 Oct 2024 20:49:27 -0400, Joel  wrote:   
      
   >NoBody  wrote:   
   >   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>It's [GAC surgery] never done below the age of 16, rarely before   
   18.  This isn't a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>real problem, just a rhetorical point for the phobes, dishonestly.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>Citations please?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>I know what I'm talking about, I was referring to within the U.S.,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>though, it should be noted.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>So you can't support your claim??   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>I defy you to refute it.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>Refute what?  You've made an unsupported claim.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>I don't do the homework of liberals.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>In other words, you can't hear a wise person when you see one.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>No, in other words, I don't do the homework of those who won't support   
   >>>>>>their clams.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>So, *you* won't do "the homework" of checking it out for yourself, you   
   >>>>>want me to prove something I already know to be true.  Fuck off and   
   >>>>>die, burn in hell.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Typical liberal - expect someone else to support or disprove their   
   >>>>claim for them because they're too lazy to appear credible by doing it   
   >>>>themselves.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Finish with a hateful remark and  get the perfect lib.   
   >>>   
   >>>I'll tell you why what I wrote is that of a "typical liberal" -   
   >>>because it was correct, based in knowledge.  You demanding evidence of   
   >>>something, you can easily verify yourself, is hypocrisy from the   
   >>>"typical right-winger" who would never ask right-wing figures for   
   >>>evidence, of their outlandish bullshit.  You're a joke.   
   >>   
   >>Your a ridiculous individual who thinks someone else should verify   
   >>your claims for you.  You are also incorrect in your use of   
   >>hypocritical.  If I make a claim I will back it up if asked.  I don't   
   >>stomp my feet and act like a child.   
   >>   
   >>In short, you can't be taken seriously.   
   >   
   >   
   >I stand by what I asserted.  They don't cut tits or cocks off of   
   >people under 16.   
      
   My reply was misdirected.  We agree on the issue.   
   My apologies for any confusion.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)