XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, comp.os.linux.advocacy, talk.politics.guns   
   XPost: alt.transgendered   
   From: NoBody@nowhere.com   
      
   On Fri, 04 Oct 2024 23:59:05 -0400, Joel  wrote:   
      
   >Governor Swill  wrote:   
   >>On Fri, 04 Oct 2024 21:09:11 -0400, Joel  wrote:   
   >>>"Scout"  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>>>> It's [GAC surgery] never done below the age of 16, rarely before 18.   
   >>>>>>> This isn't a   
   >>>>>>> real problem, just a rhetorical point for the phobes, dishonestly.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>Frankly it should be illegal below 18. Under 18 it's child abuse. It is   
   >>>>>>unnecessary and purely elective cosmetic surgery.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Wrong.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>No, that's exactly factual.   
   >>>   
   >>>16 and 17 year-old people are not children.   
   >>   
   >>Two words:  Bull shit.   
   >   
   >   
   >Free hint, claimed governor, I don't need your guidance, I'm the   
   >authority.  16 is not in *every* sense, yet, adult, but it is in a   
   >number of ways.  It's not a child.   
      
   Not sure why but Swilly is ignoring the fact that the legal defintiion   
   of an adult is someone over 18.   
      
   >   
   >   
   >>>>>>If it must be done let the court ordered and the Court will need to pay   
   >>>>>>for   
   >>>>>>this massively expenses unnecessary elective cosmetic surgery and any   
   >>>>>>future   
   >>>>>>costs than may result from it.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>Between 18-21 I'm not sure how that would work, but if the parents say   
   >>>>>>'no'   
   >>>>>>then the above conditions above would apply.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> What do "parents" have to do with people over 18, retard?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Because in all states 21 is the legal adult age were parents no longer have   
   >>>>any responsibly towards their child.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Now, if you can get all states to agree to 18, then we can lower it, but   
   >>>>since you are talking a national policy here, we have to go with the   
   >>>>highest.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>I find it interesting that an adult of your asserted superiority wouldn't   
   >>>>know that.   
   >>>   
   >>>So a state has some power over a 20 year-old?  Fuck that.   
   >>   
   >>The State has some power over all of us and just because you think the age of   
   >>majority should be eleven doesn't mean everybody thinks so.   
   >   
   >   
   >I never said anything about making the age of majority 11, silly   
   >person.   
      
   Well he is Swilly so there's that.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)