XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, comp.os.linux.advocacy, talk.politics.guns   
   XPost: alt.transgendered   
   From: me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net   
      
   "Joel"  wrote in message   
   news:s8e1gj5bfqmt9pdhrvd161s5iocl65tvd4@4ax.com...   
   > Governor Swill  wrote:   
   >>On Fri, 04 Oct 2024 21:09:11 -0400, Joel  wrote:   
   >>>"Scout"  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>>>> It's [GAC surgery] never done below the age of 16, rarely before 18.   
   >>>>>>> This isn't a   
   >>>>>>> real problem, just a rhetorical point for the phobes, dishonestly.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>Frankly it should be illegal below 18. Under 18 it's child abuse. It   
   >>>>>>is   
   >>>>>>unnecessary and purely elective cosmetic surgery.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Wrong.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>No, that's exactly factual.   
   >>>   
   >>>16 and 17 year-old people are not children.   
   >>   
   >>Two words:  Bull shit.   
   >   
   >   
   > Free hint, claimed governor, I don't need your guidance, I'm the   
   > authority.   
      
   And authority with neither authority or even knowledge of the issue....   
   isn't an authority.   
      
   >  16 is not in *every* sense, yet, adult, but it is in a   
   > number of ways.  It's not a child.   
      
   No, actually it isn't and yes, they are a child under the law in all but a   
   very few cases (ref. Emancipated Minor)   
      
   Which like becoming an adult eliminates any obligations or responsibilities   
   the parents might have for you.   
      
   You want to whack off your dick, you either figure out how to pay for it   
   yourself, or you find a way to cut or rip it off.   
      
   In either case.. your parents are no longer responsible for it or for you.   
      
   >>>>>>If it must be done let the court ordered and the Court will need to   
   >>>>>>pay   
   >>>>>>for   
   >>>>>>this massively expenses unnecessary elective cosmetic surgery and any   
   >>>>>>future   
   >>>>>>costs than may result from it.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>Between 18-21 I'm not sure how that would work, but if the parents say   
   >>>>>>'no'   
   >>>>>>then the above conditions above would apply.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> What do "parents" have to do with people over 18, retard?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Because in all states 21 is the legal adult age were parents no longer   
   >>>>have   
   >>>>any responsibly towards their child.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Now, if you can get all states to agree to 18, then we can lower it, but   
   >>>>since you are talking a national policy here, we have to go with the   
   >>>>highest.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>I find it interesting that an adult of your asserted superiority   
   >>>>wouldn't   
   >>>>know that.   
   >>>   
   >>>So a state has some power over a 20 year-old?  Fuck that.   
   >>   
   >>The State has some power over all of us and just because you think the age   
   >>of   
   >>majority should be eleven doesn't mean everybody thinks so.   
   >   
   >   
   > I never said anything about making the age of majority 11, silly   
   > person.   
      
   So what do you think the age of majority should be.. and can you get the   
   laws in the US changed to recognize that?   
      
   Otherwise.. Who cares what you think it should be.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)