Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.fan.dixie-chicks    |    Some stupid band that made fun of Bush    |    3,743 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,947 of 3,743    |
|    Rich Lewis to All    |
|    Liberal's ratings are falling all the ti    |
|    24 Dec 03 20:55:02    |
      XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.politics.democrats, alt.fan.barbra.streisand       XPost: alt.fan.j-garofalo       From: rlewis@N0SPAM.0RG              Why America Hates the democRATs                     What is with the democRATs lately? This past week they were nastier to       each other than we could ever be.              Andrew Cuomo blasted his party as "soulless and clueless" and even       praised President Bush.              Sen. Zell Miller renamed the White House wannabes and other leftists       for pushing the "shrinking party" into a "breakdown." Howard Dean       lashed back at Rep. Dick Gephardt and other rivals for "distorting his       positions for months" when, "with a combined three-quarters of a       century in Washington, D.C., they have delivered few real results."              New York democRATs such as Rep. Charlie Rangel lashed out at Wesley       Clark for his doomed support of the military's crucial base on       Vieques, Puerto Rico. (This just weeks after Rangel was lavishing       praise on the retired general.)              Even the presidential contenders admit that Americans don't like the       democRAT party. Their views on why this is so are fascinating.              David Brooks noted in the New York Times that the Dems campaigning in       New Hampshire and Iowa have been trying to explain why democRATs have       plunged from 49 percent of the electorate in the days of FDR to 32       percent today.              Dean says the party must return to its roots instead of compromising       with Republicans.              Gephardt says free trade has betrayed workers. Lieberman notes that       the party has gone too far left and too secular.              "John Edwards has the most persuasive theory," Brooks wrote. Voters       "are really good at knowing who respects them and who doesn't.       Edwards' theory is that the democRATs' besetting sin over the past few       decades has been snobbery."              The senator, a multimillionaire trial lawyer whose father worked in a       textile mill, said when announcing his candidacy, "democRATs too often       act like rural America is just someplace to fly over between a       fundraiser in Manhattan and a fundraiser in Beverly Hills."              Brooks wrote: "When I interviewed people during the 2000 campaign I       found some voters preferred democRAT policies to Republican ones. But       they didn't trust Al Gore because they thought he looked down on them.       They felt Bush could come to their barbershop and fit right in.              "Except for Bill Clinton, democRATs have nominated presidential       candidates who try to figure out Middle American values by reading the       polls, instead of feeling them in their gut. If they do it again, the       long, slow slide will continue."              There's just one problem with Edwards' analysis: he himself has       demonstrated a Gore-like contempt for the folks in North Carolina and       the rest of "flyover country" by making a condescending remark about       farmers and saying he no longer listened to country music, paid       attention to NASCAR races, or even owned a gun.              And the "long, slow slide" continues.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca