XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.impeach.bush, alt.politics.democrats   
   XPost: seattle.politics   
   From: toor@iquest.net   
      
   In article ,   
   	"thewhit"  writes:   
   >   
   > Bill Bonde ( the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack )   
   >  wrote in message   
   > news:3FECBDED.8FA5C4CD@backpacker.com...   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> Clave wrote:   
   >> >   
   >> > "Bill Bonde ( the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack )"   
   >> >  wrote in message   
   > news:3FEA08D4.13731D@backpacker.com...   
   >> > >   
   >> > >   
   >> > > Fred wrote:   
   >> > > >   
   >> > > > "Jeremy Adelson"  wrote in message   
   >> > > > news:ZTmGb.47773$ss5.41166@clgrps13...   
   >> > > > > They're all fucking hypocrites.   
   >> > > > >   
   >> > > > >   
   >> > > > and speaking of hypocrites:   
   >> > > >   
   >> > > > --   
   >> > > >  "There is no right to privacy specifically enumerated in the   
   > Constitution."   
   >> > > >   
   >> > > > Rush Limbaugh,  June 27, 2003,   
   >> > > >   
   >> > > > "It's not up to me to prove my innocence by giving up my right to   
   >> > > > privacy. I have to give up my right to privacy now in order for the   
   >> > > > state who is, in effect, just casting a line out there, hoping to   
   > net   
   >> > > > something. They've got to invade my privacy to do this."   
   >> > > >   
   >> > > Isn't Limbaugh right?   
   >> >   
   >> > Which time?   
   >> >   
   >> When has Limbaugh said other than that medical records should be under   
   >> the control of the person who they are of?   
   >>   
   >   
   > he is confusing the concept of constitutional rights vs. case law,   
   > legislative fiat etc.   
   >   
   > there is a right to privacy vis a vis medical records (and patient doctor   
   > confidentiality, priest-penitent , etc.)   
   >   
   > none of these are of course mentioned in the constitution.   
   >   
   > rush does need to understand that if he committed crimes connected to his   
   > doctor-pateint relationship, that his privacy rights vis a vis same are   
   > significantly diminished.   
   >   
   > generally, this is more applicable to dealers than users.   
   >   
   Actually, the leftists obviously believe that 'rights' are only   
   applicable resulting from their own fiat.  The lefties believe   
   that their own sense of right and wrong (which is actually   
   quite biased and perverse) carries much more weight than the   
   constitution, case law or any kind of human kindness or fairness.   
      
   There is DEFINITELY a witch-hunt going on against Limbaugh, but   
   that is to be expected considering those who hate him so very   
   much.  From the left's standpoint, fairness only counts for those   
   who believe in their own religion -- which is little different than   
   the historical racism in the south.  The US left is much more   
   similar to the skinhead mentality than they'll ever admit   
   (probably because they aren't self-aware, and have minimal   
   consiousness due to limited intellect.)   
      
   John   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)