XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.impeach.bush, alt.politics.democrats
XPost: seattle.politics
From: usenet@mile23.com.r3m0v3
John S. Dyson wrote:
> In article <1g6l000.9hxhrdc15qo0N%usenet@mile23.com.r3m0v3>,
> usenet@mile23.com.r3m0v3 (Paul Mitchum) writes:
> > thewhit wrote:
> >
> >> people do not generally go to jail for this stuff, unless they REPEATEDLY
> >> violate after it comes to the authority's attention
> >>
> >> so many people have a hard-on to see rush prosecuted, but that's the
> >> reality of how drug cases work.
> >
> > The entertaining part is that Rush himself has a hard-on to see people
> > like himself prosecuted.
> >
> This is one case where the lefties are irritated that Rush's opinions
> aren't law.
No, not at all. At least in my case (even though I'm not a lefty; I only
play one on usenet).
> Isn't it interesting that the loony left would like to see that Rush's
> personal opinion now be treated as if it was the law.
I think you're totally misreading me. Rush's stated opinion is that
people in his current position should be locked up and the key thrown
away. Rush's *actual* opinion, however, is that he can release some
story to the press about how his freakin' *maid* took advantage of his
addiction, in order to bend public opinion. If Barbara Streisand had
done what he's done, Rush would have been on record saying she was just
another reckless liberal.
That's why I say it's entertaining.
> Remember (for you lefties), the law isn't a toy for you to play with and
> misinterpret. This is one reason why the loony left wants to overwhelm
> the courts with activist (instead of constitutionalist) judges.
That's the second most stupid thing I've read tonight on usenet. The
first is Cap'n TrVth, so don't think you're off the hook.
--
"As long as their soda cans are red, white, and blue ones..."
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
