XPost: alt.fan.barbra.streisand, can.politics, alt.politics.democrats
XPost: alt.fan.j-garofalo
From: no@spam.com
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:31:16 -0500, E. Barry Bruyea
wrote:
>On 15 Jan 2004 02:32:35 -0800, maff91@yahoo.com (maff) wrote:
>
>>LiberalsLieLikeCrazy@yahoo.com (Cleopatra) wrote in message ne
s:...
>>> maff91@yahoo.com (maff) wrote in message news:<18510aff.0401
41152.6fe83889@posting.google.com>...
>>> >
>>> > But it's Bible Belt fundamentalists and Confederates who're desperate.
>>> > Did you think that the Union was going to stand idly by when you fired
>>> > on Fort Sumter?
>>>
>>> Twinky, do you frauds ever tire of bleating about fundies and assorted
>>> other largely non-existent Christian bogeymen? I mean, it's clear to
>>> anyone with half a brain that you use this as a convenient rationale
>>> for being otherwise rejected at the polls.
>>>
>>> If there were even .0000000000000012% of the fundamentalists who you
>>> liberals claim there are standing in the way of *progress,* there
>>> would be about 7 democrats in congress and zero democrat senators.
>>
>>But it isn't about Democrats or Republicans. When half of the
>>population doesn't even vote, it's the fundamentalists who vote en
>>masse for the Bushie fascists.
>
>For most of the almost 14 decades since the U.S. civil war, most
>Southerners & 'Fundies' were/are democrats. All of the 'Grand
>Dragons' of the KKK were democrats. There is even an ex Klan leader
>sitting as a democrat in the U.S. congress.
>
Were and are are not the same thing. The KKK guys, Fundies, etc,
started to leave the Democratic party as soon as a Democratic
president desegregated the armed forces. Those who left ended up in
the Republican party.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
