XPost: alt.fan.britney-spears, alt.fan.madonna, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   XPost: alt.politics, alt.politics.bush, alt.politics.clinton   
   XPost: soc.culture.jewish, triangle.general   
      
   Yeah, dat toilet seat bullshit iz a perfect xampl. Ifn I find it down I leve it   
   down an piss all ova it. Dat teachez dem bitchez ta whine an kvetch.   
   Afta dey get dere stooopid assez wet da first time I heer no mor complaintz!   
   In fact dey lift it up fer me rom den on.   
      
      
   Jonathan h wrote:   
   >   
   > "Chriz"  wrote in message   
   > news:c1kgfq$1j1k8s$1@ID-207118.news.uni-berlin.de...   
   > >   
   > > ""MIDIcian" (tm)"  wrote in message   
   > > news:c1juis$lgg$0@pita.alt.net...   
   > > > Your dictionary is attempting to redefine the word "marriage" to a more   
   > > > conservative word than it really is.   
   > > >   
   > > > BTW:  A descendent of Webster was at the what was it, 1993 Republic   
   > > > convention (the convention that elected Clinton the 2nd time (because   
   > they   
   > > > put up Dole and only ran on an anti-Clinton/Liberal (which Clinton   
   > isn't,   
   > > > btw (he's a moderate)) campaign.   
   > >   
   > > Wasn't the Bible the first and most accurate definition of what marriage   
   > was   
   > > about?   
   > >   
   > >   
   >   
   > no.  marriage is a function of society and religion to control the inherent   
   > instinctual actions of males.  According to the process of adaptation and/or   
   > evolution, the more fit male will procreate with more females, thus   
   > spreading his seed further and creating physical healthier babies.  marriage   
   > is a function of society in that it controls the natural male behavior of   
   > impregnation then moving on, thus protecting the female from desertion.   
   > this is an acceptable and, in some ways, very necessary thing, but religion   
   > got a hold of it and made up all this sacred shit about it.  the male's   
   > desire to have affairs is quite natural, and women's desire to have monogamy   
   > is quite natural, given the different evolutionary instincts of these two   
   > very different creatures.  but the man's side of it is the one deemed not   
   > acceptable.  once again, things on a mass scale are done to please women,   
   > disregarding men's instincts and the women still bitch about equality as   
   > they sob in front of the judge and get 70% of every thing that the hapless   
   > husband worked for.  I'd like to tell you about toilet seats.  if i walk   
   > into a bathroom and the seat is down, then i am inconvenienced by having to   
   > lift it up.  but then, as if that weren't enough, i have to put it back down   
   > to avoid the women being inconvenienced.  what?  wouldn't it make more sense   
   >  for each party to do half the work?  if i walk in and the seat is down, i   
   > put it up.  she walks in and the seat is up, then she puts it down.  that   
   > makes sense and is fair.  that, in and of itself, is enough of a reason for   
   > most women to dislike the idea.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)