XPost: alt.fan.j-garofalo, alt.atheism, alt.radio.talk   
   XPost: seattle.politics   
   From: usenet@mile23.com.r3m0v3   
      
    wrote:   
      
   > On Thu, 8 Apr 2004 16:10:56 -0700, usenet@mile23.com.r3m0v3 (Paul Mitchum)   
   > wrote:   
   [..]   
   > >It's interesting because Kerry has only talked in broad terms about what   
   > >he'd do. I think it's difficult for him, because he doesn't want to be   
   > >seen as undermining whatever it is that Bush is doing (and, uh.. what IS   
   > >Bush doing?), but at the same time he'd like to put out a more detailed   
   > >plan.   
   >   
   > It's hard to run against when over 60% of the public says they still   
   > support the war, and yet only 40% believe Bush has managed it an   
   > adequately.   
   >   
   > So the issue becomes management - not the war itself. And as we';ve been   
   > saying since a pull out is impractical there's no point in it as a   
   > campaign issue.  Though he is saying we need the UN and "a real   
   > coalition".   
      
   The thing is, BushCo hasn't been able to generate a 'real coalition,'   
   and the UN is sitting on its hands, justifiably. It'd be nice to know   
   whether they're simply waiting for Bush to be out of the picture.   
      
   --   
   "Maybe the mothers of our nation should remind us   
                        That we're sitting too close   
                                   To the television"   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)