XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.fan.barbra.streisand, alt.fan.j-garofalo   
   XPost: alt.fan.julia-roberts   
   From: westley@visi.com   
      
   "PLMerite"  writes:   
   >"Brian Westley"  wrote in message   
   >news:4075c56c$0$17258$a1866201@newsreader.visi.com...   
   >> "PLMerite"  writes:   
   >> >"Brian Westley"  wrote in message   
   >> >news:40755007$0$17251$a1866201@newsreader.visi.com...   
   >> >> "PLMerite"  writes:   
   >> >>   
   >> >> So, why'd Shrub attack IRAQ?  The TERRORISTS weren't FROM THERE, moron!   
   >>   
   >> >HOW THE FUCK DO YOU KNOW, MORON?   
   >>   
   >> Because WE KNOW where the terrorists were from, moron, and it WASN'T IRAQ.   
      
   >Yeah, and most of 'em weren't from Afghansitan, either, dimwit.   
      
   But that's where al Qaeada was, and where a lot of them got   
   training.  What did the terrorists do in Iraq?   
      
   >The whole Middle East/North Africa is a cesspool that needs to be cleaned   
   >out.   
      
   And how does this justify removing troops from Afghanistan   
   who were searching for actual terrorists to move them to Iraq?   
      
   >> >Saddam was financially supporting suicide bombers in Israel, what makes   
   >you   
   >> >think he wasn't supporting others?   
   >>   
   >> He wasn't supporting the 9/11 terrorists BECAUSE WE KNOW WHO WAS, MORON!   
      
   >Yeah, how?   
      
   Osama bil-Laden has hundreds of millions of dollars and supported the   
   9/11 terrorists; on what basis do you think Iraq was supporting them?   
      
   >> >Where did his stocks of WMD go while you lefties were shilling for him   
   >and   
   >> >delaying things?   
   >>   
   >> It was imaginary; if he HAD weapons, WHY DIDN'T HE USE THEM WHEN   
   >> THE US ATTACKED?   
      
   >Imaginary?  You mean the ones that the UN was still cleaning out in the 90s?   
      
   You mean the ones Rumsfeld sold him, and the ones that were cleaned   
   out in the early 90s, like the chemical weapons that had a shelf-life   
   of less than ten years and would be useless in the 21st century?   
   Those ones?   
      
   >Saddam used the delay provided by France, et al ("No blood, for oil money")   
   >to get 'em out of the country.   
      
   Get WHAT weapons out of the country?  Into WHERE?   
   Shrub & Co. would just LOVE to find them, so why don't   
   you take your valuable intelligence information and tell   
   the administration where to find them?   
      
   >> And, of course, where are these weapons now, if he had them?   
      
   >Buried in Syria or Lebanon.   
      
   And what's your source on this?   
      
   >> >Which country would you have "Shrub" attack, then, that wouldn't get your   
   >> >panties in a twist?   
   >>   
   >> The country WHICH TRAINED the terrorists and where Osama bin-Laden   
   >> was hiding, moron.  Afghanistan.  Remember that country?  The one   
   >> we REMOVED troops hunting for terrorists which actually attacked   
   >> the US so they could attack Iraq?   
      
   >We did liberate Afghanistan.   
      
   It's not done; but instead of finishing things, they were   
   pulled off on Bush's Iraq stunt.   
      
   >Iraq was the next country with the greatest   
   >need.   
      
   Greatest need of what?  Liberation from its oil?   
      
   How about Uganda?  The "Lord's Resistance Army" has   
   been kidnapping children, raping children, and forcing   
   children to kill other children for almost 20 years now.   
   They want to install a government based on the 10 commandments.   
   Isn't that bad, too?  Why not liberate Uganda?  They don't   
   have oil, but why should that matter?   
      
   ---   
   Merlyn LeRoy   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)