Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.fan.dixie-chicks    |    Some stupid band that made fun of Bush    |    3,743 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,549 of 3,743    |
|    Liberals_HATE-America! to All    |
|    Clinton's Insane Left-Wing Policies Invi    |
|    15 Apr 04 13:53:50    |
      XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.greens, alt.politics.gw-bush       XPost: alt.politics.liberalism, alt.politics.republicans, alt.radio.talk       From: realpilot_1@libsHATEusa.com              Last week, 9-11 commissioner John Lehman revealed that "it was the policy       (before 9-11) and I believe remains the policy today to fine airlines if       they have more than two young Arab males in secondary questioning because       that's discriminatory." Hmmm ... Is 19 more than two? Why, yes, I believe it       is. So if two Jordanian cab drivers are searched before boarding a flight       out of Newark, Osama bin Laden could then board that plane without being       questioned. I'm no security expert, but I'm pretty sure this gives       terrorists an opening for an attack.              In a sane world, Lehman's statement would have made headlines across the       country the next day. But not one newspaper, magazine or TV show has       mentioned that it is official government policy to prohibit searching more       than two Arabs per flight.              Meanwhile, another 9-11 commissioner, the greasy Richard Ben-Veniste,       claimed to be outraged that the CIA did not immediately give intelligence on       9-11 hijackers Nawaf Alhazmi and Khalid Almihdhar to the FBI. As we now       know – or rather, I alone know because I'm the only person in America       watching the 9-11 hearings – Ben-Veniste should have asked his fellow       commissioner Jamie Gorelick about that.              In his testimony this week, John Ashcroft explained that the FBI wasn't even       told Almihdhar and Alhazmi were in the country until weeks before the 9-11       attack – because of Justice Department guidelines put into place in 1995.       The FBI wasn't allowed to put al-Qaida specialists on the hunt for Almihdhar       and Alhazmi – because of Justice Department guidelines put into place in       1995. Indeed, the FBI couldn't get a warrant to search Zacarias Moussaoui's       computer – because of Justice Department guidelines put into place in 1995.              The famed 1995 guidelines were set forth in a classified memorandum written       by the then-deputy attorney general titled "Instructions for Separation of       Certain Foreign Counterintelligence and Criminal Investigations," which       imposed a "draconian" wall between counterintelligence and criminal       investigations.              What Ashcroft said next was breathtaking. Prohibited from mounting a serious       search for Almihdhar and Alhazmi, an irritated FBI investigator wrote to FBI       headquarters, warning that someone would die because of these policies –       "since the biggest threat to us, OBL (Osama bin Laden), is getting the most       protection."              FBI headquarters responded: "We're all frustrated with this issue. These are       the rules. NSLU (National Security Law Unit) does not make them up. But       somebody did make these rules. Somebody built this wall."              The person who built that wall described in the infamous 1995 memo, Ashcroft       said, "is a member of the commission." If this were an episode of "Matlock,"       the camera would slowly pan away from Ashcroft's face at this point and then       quickly jump to an extreme close-up of Jamie Gorelick's horrified       expression. Armed marshals would then escort the kicking, screaming Gorelick       away in leg irons as the closing credits rolled. Gorelick was the deputy       attorney general in 1995.              The 9-11 commission has finally uncovered the proverbial "smoking gun"! But       it was fired by one of the 9-11 commissioners. Maybe between happy       reminiscences about the good old days of Ruby Ridge, Waco and the Elian       Gonzales raid, Ben-Veniste could ask Gorelick about those guidelines.       Democrats think it's a conflict of interest for Justice Scalia to have his       name in the same phonebook as Dick Cheney. But there is no conflict of       interest having Gorelick sit on a commission that should be investigating       her.              Bill O'Reilly's entire summary of Ashcroft's testimony was to accuse       Ashcroft of throwing sheets over naked statues rather than fighting       terrorism. No mention of the damning Gorelick memo. No one knows about the       FAA's No-Searching-Arabs counterterrorism policy. Predictions that       conservatives have finally broken through the wall of sound coming from the       mainstream media may have been premature.              When Democrats make an accusation against Republicans, newspaper headlines       repeat the accusation as a fact: "U.S. Law Chief 'Failed to Heed Terror       Warnings,'" "Bush Was Told of Qaida Steps Pre-9-11; Secret Memo Released,"       "Bush White House Said to Have Failed to Make al-Qaida an Early Priority."              But when Republicans make accusations against Democrats – even accusations       backed up by the hard fact of a declassified Jamie Gorelick memo – the       headlines note only that Republicans are making accusations: "Ashcroft Lays       Blame at Clinton's Feet," "Ashcroft: Blame Bubba for 9-11," "Ashcroft Faults       Clinton in 9-11 Failures."              It's amazing how consistent it is. A classic of the genre was the Chicago       Tribune headline, which managed to use both constructs in a single headline:       "Ashcroft Ignored Terrorism, Panel Told; Attorney General Denies Charges,       Blames Clinton." Why not: "Reno Ignored Terrorism, Panel Told; Former Deputy       Attorney General Denies Charges, Blames Bush"?              Democrats actively created policies that were designed to hamstring       terrorism investigations. The only rap against the Bush administration is       that it failed to unravel the entire 9-11 terrorism plot based on a memo       titled: "Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside the United States."              I have news for liberals: Bin Laden is still determined to attack inside the       United States! Could they please tell us when and where the next attack will       be? Because unless we know that, it's going to be difficult to stop it if we       can't search Arabs.              The BRILLIANT & BEAUTIFUL Ann Coulter              (Attention Liberal bigots, racists & hate-mongers... Insert your usual       hate-filled personal attacks HERE if unable to refute the article... as       usual!)                     --       Poor Liberals. They HATE America but they just can't seem to find a better       country to live in.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca