XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.fan.barbra.streisand, alt.fan.j-garofalo
XPost: alt.fan.julia-roberts
From: Vithant01@comcast.net
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 00:26:08 GMT, Dr. Don Griffen
wrote:
>Bill Clinton is Utterly Classless! And So Are All Other Liberals Too!
>
>
>Drudge is running a story quoting a source as saying President Clinton
>is privately expressing anger that he was left off the speakers' list
>for Friday's Reagan State funeral. He's got his panties in a knot
>because both
>Presidents Bush will speak, but not him or Jimmy Carter. What?
>
What a childish comment. The Reagan funeral was a state affair and not
some down home funeral. If they had not wanted to follow protocol they
should have had a private ceremony, but nanc had to have those last
fifteen minutes. You people talk about tradition but a willing to dump
tradition when it suits your needs.
you suck.
>You've got to be kidding me. If this is true (and Drudge is usually
>right,) this is pathetic. Can't somebody decide who they want to speak
>at their own funeral? Press reports say the preparations for this
>funeral were made as far back as 1989, right after Reagan left office.
>Nancy Reagan (who is almost 83) is probably making the final decision
>on who gets to speak and who doesn't. It is her right to decide that
>and nobody else's business. So what is this really about?
>
Protocol and civility, unheard of in the fundy communities.
>Clinton's probably mad because he won't get to be on TV, and won't be
>able to be associated with the Reagan magic. He has a book coming out,
>you know...and he wants publicity. Considering some of his painfully
>long and boring speeches, the Reagan family probably wants to prevent
>him from hijacking the event for his own purposes.
>
Snoreeeeee!
>Unbelievable...but then considering the source, should we have
>expected anything less?
>
>Neal Boortz
\
Neal is quite a Bootz.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
