Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.fan.dixie-chicks    |    Some stupid band that made fun of Bush    |    3,743 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,937 of 3,743    |
|    "W. K. Mahler" William K. Mahler to All    |
|    M2 TECH: ALL WAR IS NOW LOCAL (1/3)    |
|    09 Oct 04 17:46:13    |
      From: wkmahler@mahlers.com              Nonlethality Headlines & Recommendations              Š 2003 Chris Morris & Janet Morris                            All War Is Now Local       ? In the twenty-first century, as a consequence of the fall of the Soviet       Union and the rise of CNN, the internet and globalization, terrorists and       rogue entities, often pan-national, are waging symbolic warfare against       modernity. Structures emblematic of globalizing influence are the high       value targets of techno-powered barbarism. The plight of Western-modeled       Israel, locked in an asymmetric struggle with an enemy expert in symbolic       warfare, points to the fate awaiting pluralistic societies unable to address       or adapt to the symbolic warfare mindset, and the tactics and strategies of       those who have no centralized economic infrastructure, no geographic       holdings at risk. This war is here, now, and because of the reach of global       media, everywhere is a lot closer to home than it used to be.               We face groups loosely knit by ideological affinities, more discrete and       difficult to track than religious bias or political allegiance: the groups       can be anywhere; they recognize each other's goals of destruction of an       embryonic world economy in which they cannot compete and of a rule of law       that they do not wish to apply to them. They must be overcome by measures       capable of disarming, disheartening and demoralizing them, not solely by a       strategy of eradication. Mere death and destruction wreaked by the West       accrue to this enemy's benefit, proving their thesis that annihilation is       still King in all struggles for earthly power and that massive projections       of power are the hallmark of the great Satan.               All war is local now. And now we all must prepare to counter these       transient adversaries in all their shapes and guises where we live, and in       the process preserve what we value most: our families, our beliefs, our       freedoms, our institutions, and our future. To do so effectively we will       need to create and utilize technological means and measures suited for use       here, where we live ? means that are life and property conserving,       environmentally friendly, and fiscally responsible. Such promising means       are being researched and developed by the Department of Defense under the       rubric of nonlethal weapons, although to date only scant funding has been       applied. It is important that this fledgling effort reach its       congressionally directed goal of coordinating all efforts aimed at providing       additional rheostatic force projection capabilities to contain conflict and       destruction while conserving life.                            Breaking the Cycle of Retributive Violence Nonlethally              ? Whenever we strike lethally, we risk making those who resort to terror       stronger. Whenever we amputate a tentacle of terror, the forges of       fanaticism are fanned. We play into a strategy of our adversaries who wish       to portray us as no better than cornered beasts, lashing out with no regard       for whom or what we destroy ? just like them. They use this portrayal to       inflame their constituents, attract new support, and justify their calls for       more and more extreme acts of retaliation. To win in this conflict we must       break this cycle, change the rules, and set new criteria for ultimate       victory based on our strength ? on our regard for life, liberty and the       pursuit of happiness. As we move against terror we must begin to signal our       ultimate intent by the way we use force, lest we become terror's patsies ?       or worse, its mimics.               We possess undeniable, overwhelming lethal capability. And our adversary       this time out is counting on us to overdo it in our efforts to eradicate       him, to adopt overkill as our standard operating procedure and provide him       endless rolls of martyrs with which to brainwash his young and fill his       zombie ranks to overflowing. To deny him this advantage and undermine and       defeat his strategy, we must complete our warfighting capacity by filling an       historic deficiency in warfighting options.               To our overwhelming lethal capacity we must add a final tier of no less       overwhelming nonlethal capabilities to use when closing with an enemy amidst       innocents ? especially our own. We must set a goal of being decisively       nonlethal if need be, destroying an adversary's ability to harm us while       minimizing harm to those around him as we do so. By completing our panoply       of coercive responses we will increase the dimensions of victory and       ultimately break the senseless cycle of retributive violence.                            Stop Killing the Customer:              Open Trade Networks vs. Closed Fanatical Networks              ? The world's economies are globalizing, far flung economic interests       working cheek by jowl together around the planet via analog and virtual       networks. These fragile networks must be defended against those who find       capitalism and the challenges of competing in a world economy too terrifying       to contemplate, and whose economic consumption model is currently       conflict-based.               The civilizing world no longer gets to keep what it conquers; it pays       reconstruction costs to rebuild and restore to economic function those it       damages. To the globalizing financial networks there are no enemies, only       competitors rushing to market and customers climbing toward preferred       trading status. For the global trade model, wars of attrition are       economically digressive and disruptive.               Rogue military states or terror networks on the other hand want to keep       what they can take, and pay can no heed to rule of law. For their model,       the soft symbolic infrastructure targets of trade are too tempting to       resist.               Targets of opportunity for the rogue are myriad, as are business       opportunities for the emergent 24/7 virtual world trading establishment.       Let us use every means at our disposal, including nontraditional, nonlethal,       and Mass Protection technologies, capabilities and responses to safeguard       the planet's trade and production systems and avoid killing tomorrow's       customers.                            How Will We Know When We're Winning?              ? Nonlethal Responses for A World in Which Death Creates Martyrs and       Destruction Creates Heroes              ? Can we destroy an enemy's war-making fervor by destroying his war-making       capability? Certainly. How? With weapons that sterilize and destroy his       chemical and biological capabilities? Of course. With microbes that eat his       microbes? Certainly. With energy weapons to drive his warfighters from       their posts? Positively. Can we build a set of responses that will prevent       him from launching explosives against us, or prevent the detonation of those              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca