XPost: alt.fan.barbra.streisand, alt.fan.j-garofalo, alt.fan.julia-roberts
XPost: alt.politics.democrats
From: here@home.com
"Christopher Helms" wrote in
news:DsWTd.284852$w62.80668@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net:
>
>>Leland Milton Goldblatt , PhD. wrote in message
>><1109380329.957139.247960@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>...
>>Swift Boat says REAL AARP is liberal?
>
>>Without prejudice; Dr. Goldblatt pontificates ®:--
>
>>The same Republicans who used to love AARP when it helped them pass
>>the president's prescription drug plan now hate AARP because it is
>>against the president's plan to privatize Social Security.
>
>>The American Spectator website only a short time. But, boy, was it a
>>doozy. It showed two photos. One was of an American soldier in combat
>>gear with a big red X through it. The other was of a gay couple
>>kissing as they were married; it had a big green check mark through
>>it.
>
>
> Gay people getting married doesn't make one damn dime for Halliburton.
>
>
>>Below
>>the photos was the headline: "The REAL AARP Agenda." You read that
>>right: The ad asserted that AARP, the nonpartisan organization that
>>represents more than 35 million older Americans, hates this country's
>>military but loves gay marriage. Both will, of course, come as a real
>>surprise to lots of grandmas and grandpas, and for good reason:
>>Neither is true. Welcome to the world of Republican slimeball
>>politics.
>
>>Welcome, seniors, to the world of Republican slime throwing. You are
>>about to get a small taste of what Kerry went through with those
>>repugnant Swift Boat vets. This, alas, is how the Bush White House
>>works: Rather than debate issues on the up and up, it depends on
>>surrogates to go directly at an "enemy's" strength. In Kerry's case it
>>was his distinguished war record. In the case of AARP, we're guessing
>>it's the group's reputation as a rather stodgy but dependable and
>>trustworthy advocate for seniors.
>
>>Oh, and of course you can wait for the protestations that the White
>>House had nothing to do with the anti-AARP campaign. But of course you
>>wouldn't swallow that, would you?
>
>>Senator Jon Corzine of New Jersey sent a letter to President Bush
>>yesterday calling the USA Next ad "incendiary" and asking him to
>>denounce such tactics. But, of course, President Bush has nothing
>>whatsoever to do with any of this. Right?
>
> Yet another bulletproof post from Dr. Goldblatt.
>
>
> It's all about channeling public money to private interests and
> helping BushCo's friends grab and keep every single dime they can get
> their hands on, regardless of how they got it. The rationale or cover
> story ("Social Security is in crisis," "Iraq has WMDs," "tax cuts will
> stimulate the economy," "frivolous lawsuits are the reason why
> healthcare costs so much") is always secondary. Money is what George W
> Bush is all about and what the "conservative" movement has degenerated
> into. That's what the Iraq invasion was all about. That's why nobody
> on the right gives a damn about deficits. Rich people give money to
> Republicans and rich people get tax cuts. That's what Social Security
> "reform" is all about-channeling public money to Wall Street
> interests. That's what tort "reform" was all about. It wasn't because
> George W Bush gave a damn about medical or drug costs, health
> insurance costs, malpractice insurance costs or the burden placed on
> the court system by "frivolous" lawsuits filed by people who we
> injured by inept doctors. Health insurance costs are not and will not
> be coming down and nobody anywhere will ever ask George W Bush why it
> didn't happen after he got his moronic law passed. He never gave a
> rats ass about health care costs or or how many uninsured Americans
> there were. It was because major Republican donors like the tobacco
> industry and drug companies had problems with legal exposure and he
> was more interested in helping them than doing anything about dealing
> with the actual reasons why they had that exposure. When it was
> realized that a subsidiary of Halliburton had massive (we're talking
> tens of billions of dollars here) in Asbestos-related liabilities
> George W Bush began publicly weeping about people burdening the court
> system by suing corporations over things like Asbestos and he vowed to
> do everything in his power to make it as difficult as he could for
> individuals to sue the corporations that had screwed them. It's all
> about money. Everything else is secondary with these guys, including
> the well being of seniors. They don't give a damn about old folks or
> schools or Osama bin Laden or anything else that doesn't write checks
> to the RNC.
>
> It is very sad that the AARP brought the horrific title of "liberal"
> upon itself when it interfered with the Bush administrations plan to
> use Social Security taxes to enrich their friends, but it is also
> encouraging that a large group of generally conservative people
> represented by the AARP have finally developed some mistrust of the
> lying, ignorant, greedy bastard George W Bush. He is a fraud and not
> even a convincing fraud and now older folks know what the rest of us
> have known for years. He pulls this crap all the time.
>
> And then he wonders why nobody believes him when he swears to god that
> he is not planning to invade Iran.
>
> Hating Bush. It's not just for liberals anymore.
>
>
>
>
>
Another off topic wanker!!!!
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
