XPost: alt.fan.air-america, alt.fan.j-garofalo, alt.fan.julia-roberts   
   XPost: alt.politics.democrats   
   From: chase@cheese.net   
      
   On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 15:37:49 -0500, BleedingBush@dc.not puked:   
      
   >On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 18:17:31 GMT, lab~rat  wrote:   
   >   
   >>On 12 Oct 2005 11:04:25 -0700, "natch"  puked:   
   >>   
   >>>if it isnt clear to you then you are dense, it is as clear as one can   
   >>>get   
   >>   
   >>Yeah, I'm dense if you consider the response a valid one to the   
   >>question that was asked.  In case you forgot the question, it was,   
   >>"Hmmm.  Did Rush ever advocate offing the Clintons?"   
   >>   
   >>I don't see an answer there, only a typical Dem changing the subject.   
   >   
   >Since all Republicans speak from their Borg collective of lies, one   
   >Good Little Nazi is the same as the next.  Your evasiveness is   
   >confirmation of your wish to be a co-conspirator with Cunter.   
      
   I think the evasiveness that will go on record as being the one that   
   didn't answer the question :   
      
   "Hmmm.  Did Rush ever advocate offing the Clintons?"   
      
   Changing the subject and accusing me of what I accused that poster of   
   isn't working in this case.  There happens to be a written record, and   
   you have shown yourself to be a dummy.   
      
   Nonetheless, Randi Rhodes promoted the death of the president, do you   
   think that was appropriate?  Would you join her in condoning the   
   shooting of President Bush?   
   --   
   lab~rat  >:-)   
   Do you want polite or do you want sincere?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)