XPost: alt.fan.air-america, alt.fan.j-garofalo, alt.fan.julia-roberts   
   XPost: alt.politics.democrats   
   From: chase@cheese.net   
      
   On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 02:49:29 -0500, BleedingBush@dc.not puked:   
      
   >On Thu, 13 Oct 2005 12:54:06 GMT, lab~rat  wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 15:37:49 -0500, BleedingBush@dc.not puked:   
   >>   
   >>>On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 18:17:31 GMT, lab~rat  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>On 12 Oct 2005 11:04:25 -0700, "natch"  puked:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>if it isnt clear to you then you are dense, it is as clear as one can   
   >>>>>get   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Yeah, I'm dense if you consider the response a valid one to the   
   >>>>question that was asked.  In case you forgot the question, it was,   
   >>>>"Hmmm.  Did Rush ever advocate offing the Clintons?"   
   >>>>   
   >>>>I don't see an answer there, only a typical Dem changing the subject.   
   >>>   
   >>>Since all Republicans speak from their Borg collective of lies, one   
   >>>Good Little Nazi is the same as the next.  Your evasiveness is   
   >>>confirmation of your wish to be a co-conspirator with Cunter.   
   >>   
   >>I think the evasiveness that will go on record as being the one that   
   >>didn't answer the question :   
   >>   
   >>"Hmmm.  Did Rush ever advocate offing the Clintons?"   
   >>   
   >>Changing the subject and accusing me of what I accused that poster of   
   >>isn't working in this case.  There happens to be a written record, and   
   >>you have shown yourself to be a dummy.   
   >>   
   >>Nonetheless, Randi Rhodes promoted the death of the president, do you   
   >>think that was appropriate?  Would you join her in condoning the   
   >>shooting of President Bush?   
   >   
   >A dittohead like you who has no credibility at all should provide a   
   >link to his little assertion before he starts self-dating.  Without   
   >your link, any other reply by you on this subject are the words of a   
   >fool.   
      
   You're trolling, right?  There's no way that you could be so stupid to   
   pontificate like you did in your post without trying to be funny.   
      
   If you ARE that stupid, maybe you should look at the original post in   
   this thread where this link is given:   
      
   http://www.nydailynews.com/05-12-2004/news/politics/story/192675p-166266c.html   
      
   I really hope you were kidding.  I would hate to think you made an ass   
   out of yourself this enthusiastically...   
      
   LOL.   
   --   
   lab~rat  >:-)   
   Do you want polite or do you want sincere?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)