Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.politics.economics    |    "Its the economy, stupid"    |    345,374 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 343,574 of 345,374    |
|    davidp to All    |
|    Needing Younger Workers, Federal Officia    |
|    01 May 23 08:38:31    |
      From: lessgovt@gmail.com              Needing Younger Workers, Federal Officials Relax Rules on Past Drug Use       By Ernesto Londoño, April 30, 2023, NY Times       Not long ago, urinating in a cup for a drug test was a widely accepted, if       annoying, requirement to start a new job. The legalization of marijuana in       more and more states in recent years upended that, prompting many employers to       shelve hiring rules from        the “Just Say No” era.              There was a major holdout: the federal govt, by far the nation’s largest       employer. But now, it too is significantly relaxing drug screening rules as       agencies struggle to replenish the ranks of a rapidly aging work force in a       tight job market.              During the past five years, the U.S. military gave more than 3,400 new       recruits who failed a drug test on their first day a grace period to try       again, according to data obtained through a Freedom of Information Act       request. Agencies like the C.I.A. and        the F.B.I. have adopted more lenient rules regarding past use of marijuana       among job candidates, officials acknowledge.              And later this year, the Biden admin is expected to take another major step,       scaling back how deeply the government delves into the drug histories of       people applying for a security clearance.              Polls show that more than half of Americans have used marijuana recreationally       or medicinally and that a majority believe it should be legal. Medical       cannabis use is legal in 38 states and the District of Columbia. Recreational       marijuana is lawful in 22        states as well as the nation’s capital but remains illegal under federal law.              “We don’t want to be disqualifying half of the population, tens of       millions of people, for having done something that most of our recent       presidents have done,” said Representative Jamie Raskin, a Maryland Democrat       who has introduced legislation        that would deem marijuana use immaterial in security clearance reviews       required for many federal jobs. “You’re taking huge numbers of people off       the field.”              Once hired, federal employees remain barred from using drugs including       marijuana, even in states that have legalized it. And while there is broad       support for more permissive hiring policies regarding past marijuana use, the       shifting rules have critics.              When Gen. David H. Berger became the commandant of the Marine Corps in 2019,       he expressed concern about how prevalent drug use had become among Marines.              “I remain troubled by the extent to which drug abuse is a characteristic of       new recruits, and the fact the vast majority of recruits require drug waivers       for enlistment,” he wrote in a report on the state of the Marine Corps. The       Marines declined to        provide specific data on drug waivers for enlistment.              Until recently, admitting recent drug use was disqualifying for many roles.       But even some of the government’s most selective agencies have loosened       their rules as part of a patchwork of policies that have gone largely       unnoticed outside of the federal        government.              The C.I.A., for instance, began telling applicants in April of 2022 that they       needed to refrain from using marijuana for just 90 days before submitting an       application, shortening its previous one-year eligibility requirement. In       2021, the F.B.I. reduced        its marijuana abstention requirement for those seeking employment to one year       from three.              In December 2021, Avril D. Haines, the director of national intelligence,       issued a memo stating that past recreational marijuana use ought to be       regarded as “relevant,” but “not determinative,” in deciding a       person’s suitability for sensitive        national security work.              And late last year, at the urging of senior national security officials, the       Office of Personnel Management put forward a proposed overhaul of the security       clearance vetting process that would effectively stop regarding people who       previously used        marijuana as a security risk.              Currently, people applying for a security clearance must disclose a detailed       account of their use of illegal drugs during the past seven years. Background       checks to issue security clearances explore whether an applicant has been       truthful about drug use.              Under the proposed new rules, the govt would limit that time frame to 5 years       for drugs other than marijuana, and applicants would be asked to disclose       marijuana use only during the 90 days before they sought the job.              The recent arrest of a Massachusetts Air National Guardsman accused of leaking       classified documents has renewed debate in Congress about how the government       protects its secrets. But officials said that case had not affected the       proposed overhaul of the        security clearance screening process regarding drug use histories.              A senior intelligence official involved in personnel policies said the       government is struggling to recruit people in their 20s as the unemployment       rate is among the lowest it has been in half a century. The official, who       declined to be quoted by name        because the proposed changes in the government rules remain under review, said       it had become clear that the intelligence community needed to adjust to a       changing landscape as its employees grow older.              The govt competes for talent with the private sector, which often offers       better salaries, more opportunities for remote work and, increasingly, a       laissez-faire approach to drug use that doesn’t affect job performance.              Military recruiters ask prospective service members about their alcohol and       drug use and are instructed to disqualify those with substance abuse problems       — current or past. A key hurdle comes when recruits take a drug test at a       military entrance        processing station as they officially join. For years, failing that test       usually meant getting kicked out on Day 1.              In 2022, 4,710 recruits failed their entry drug tests, a nearly 33% increase       from 2020, according to military data.              Between 2018 and 2022, the Army granted waivers to more than 3,300 recruits       who failed a drug test or admitted past drug use that technically made them       ineligible, according to Army data. The Army has historically been more       lenient with waivers than the        other services.              The Navy, which had a zero-tolerance policy for those who failed an entry drug       test, launched a pilot program in 2021 that allowed recruits the chance to       take a second test after 90 days. Over the past three years, the Navy said it       has issued drug        waivers to 1,375 recruits.                     [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca