Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.politics.economics    |    "Its the economy, stupid"    |    345,374 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 343,792 of 345,374    |
|    davidp to All    |
|    Like Lloyd and Thomas Malthus before him    |
|    09 Jul 23 23:28:12    |
      From: lessgovt@gmail.com              Like Lloyd and Thomas Malthus before him, Hardin was primarily interested in       the problem of human population growth. But in his essay, he also focused on       the use of larger (though finite) resources such as the Earth's atmosphere and       oceans, as well as        pointing out the "negative commons" of pollution (i.e., instead of dealing       with the deliberate privatization of a positive resource, a "negative commons"       deals with the deliberate commonization of a negative cost, pollution).              As a metaphor, the tragedy of the commons should not be taken too literally.       The "tragedy" is not in the word's conventional or theatric sense, nor a       condemnation of the processes that lead to it. Similarly, Hardin's use of       "commons" has frequently been        misunderstood, leading him to later remark that he should have titled his work       "The Tragedy of the Unregulated Commons".              The metaphor illustrates the argument that free access and unrestricted demand       for a finite resource ultimately reduces the resource through ov       r-exploitation, temporarily or permanently. This occurs because the benefits       of exploitation accrue to        individuals or groups, each of whom is motivated to maximize use of the       resource to the point in which they become reliant on it, while the costs of       the exploitation are borne by all those to whom the resource is available       (which may be a wider class of        individuals than those who are exploiting it). This, in turn, causes demand       for the resource to increase, which causes the problem to snowball until the       resource collapses (even if it retains a capacity to recover). The rate at       which depletion of the        resource is realized depends primarily on three factors: the number of users       wanting to consume the common in question, the consumptive nature of their       uses, and the relative robustness of the common.              The same concept is sometimes called the "tragedy of the fishers", because       fishing too many fish before or during breeding could cause stocks to plummet.              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy_of_the_commons       --       --              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca