Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.politics.economics    |    "Its the economy, stupid"    |    345,379 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 343,860 of 345,379    |
|    davidp to All    |
|    =?UTF-8?Q?Official_Data_Hinted_at_China=    |
|    19 Jul 23 23:03:16    |
      From: lessgovt@gmail.com              Official Data Hinted at China’s Hidden Covid Toll. Then It Vanished.       By Muyi Xiao, Mara Hvistendahl and James Glanz, July 19, 2023, NY Times       Official data from China offered a rare, but brief, glimpse of the true toll       of Covid, indicating that nearly as many people may have died from the virus       in a single province earlier this year as Beijing has said died in the       mainland during the entire        pandemic.              The data was deleted from a provincial govt website just days after it was       published on Thursday. But epidemiologists who reviewed a cached version of       the information said it was the latest indication that the country’s       official tally is a vast        undercount.              The number of cremations in the eastern province of Zhejiang rose to 171,000       in the first quarter of this year, the website said. That was 72,000 more       cremations, a roughly 70 percent increase, than had been reported in the same       period last year.              In February, China said the official death toll in the mainland since the       start of the pandemic was 83,150 — a remarkably low number that independent       researchers have said is not credible. Since then, the govt has released only       weekly or monthly death        tolls that, when added up, raise the overall total to about 83,700.              Covid surged across China late last year, forcing the govt to abandon its       strict pandemic restrictions in December. The government’s abrupt policy       reversal, however, left hospitals and pharmacies unprepared for the onslaught       and likely accelerated the        spread of infections and a wave of deaths across the country.              That surge of Covid infections across China lasted for about two months. The       majority of the deaths occurred in January, but many people died in December       as well. Epidemiologists estimate that 80 to 90 percent of the population was       infected.              The Zhejiang data offered a window into cremation figures that have been       closely guarded by the Chinese government. While the data does not include the       cause of death, researchers regularly use excess death statistics to estimate       the impact of major        deadly events like disasters and pandemics. Everybody who dies in Zhejiang is       cremated, officials say.              Many local and national authorities have withheld regularly published       cremation data since that first major Covid wave started late last year. It is       unclear why Zhejiang Province published data for the first quarter of this       year, but three days after it        surfaced, the report was removed.              Calls on Tuesday to multiple numbers at Zhejiang’s civil affairs bureau went       unanswered. The Beijing-based media outlet Caixin reported on the figures       Monday, but its article was also quickly taken down.              An analysis by The New York Times published in February estimated that       China’s recent Covid wave may have killed between a million and 1.5 million       people, based on research from four teams of epidemiologists.              The new data from Zhejiang — which is limited to a province of 65.8 million       people — when extrapolated to the country’s population of 1.4 billion       people, is roughly consistent with that range, experts from two of those teams       said.              Ben Cowling, an epidemiologist at the University of Hong Kong, said that the       data can be used for a crude estimate of China’s nationwide death toll.       “I’m not sure the impact would have been exactly the same in every       province, but I think it would        be useful for a rough extrapolation,” he said. “It’s consistent with the       estimates of around 1.5 million.”              Another team of researchers — Lauren Ancel Meyers, a professor of biology       and statistics at the University of Texas at Austin and Zhanwei Du, an       epidemiologist at the University of Hong Kong — reached a rough estimate of       1.54 million deaths from        December through March in mainland China, based on the cremation count.              Last year, using an entirely different method based on tests of infections,       vaccine effectiveness and other factors in China, the same research team       estimated a most likely value of 1.55 million deaths for a slightly shorter       period within a plausible        range of 1.2 million to 1.7 million. The similarity of those figures to the       current estimate probably indicates that Covid spread through all provinces in       China in a similar way after the zero Covid policy ended, Ms. Meyers said.              “The fact that you end up with these very similar numbers suggests that       things were equally devastating around the country,” Ms. Meyers said.              Yong Cai, a demographer at UNC Chapel Hill who studies mortality in China,       arrived at an estimate of 1.5 million deaths for the first quarter of the       year, based on the cremation data, and said that to gauge total mortality       during the surge, deaths in        December of last year, when cases started to spike, needed to be factored in.              He said he was surprised by Zhejiang’s cremation number. “It’s higher       than I expected.”              Zhejiang is one of China’s wealthiest provinces, with good health care and       an elderly vaccination rate above the national average. Its age distribution       population is roughly representative of China on the whole, with 19 percent of       the population over        60. In December, as Covid spread widely, Zhejiang’s health authorities       announced that the province was recording one million infections a day.              All four epidemiologists and demographers cautioned that there are caveats and       uncertainties in extrapolating the cremation data. But without more reliable       data from China, academics say they have to rely on imperfect information to       estimate the impact        of the virus.              “We don’t have anything better,” Mr. Cai said.              Other recent clues hint at the impact elsewhere in the country. Data released       earlier this year showed a substantial decline in Shanghai’s life       expectancy, from 84.1 in 2021 to 83.2 in 2022, for the first time at this       scale since 1983. The drop is        likely attributable to the December Covid surge combined with a stringent       lockdown in the spring of that year, which prevented some residents from       accessing medical care, Mr. Cai said.              “I sincerely hope that the Chinese govt can publish all the data available,       make it transparent so people can understand what’s going on,” he said.       “They have the data. It’s sitting somewhere.”              https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/19/world/asia/china-covid-data-toll.html              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca