Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.politics.economics    |    "Its the economy, stupid"    |    345,374 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 343,863 of 345,374    |
|    davidp to All    |
|    Gaia Baracetti, on immigration into W. E    |
|    20 Jul 23 10:24:14    |
      From: lessgovt@gmail.com              Gattopardi and cheap labor       Reflections from Italy on the wicked problem of unregulated and unregulatable        immigration into Western Europe.       by Gaia Baracetti, July 4, The Overpopulation Project              I could never understand what animal exactly the gattopardo was supposed to       be.        A leopard? A cheetah? A mythical beast? For sure, none of those roams my       country.        But I, like most Italians, always understood the meaning of the adjective        gattopardesco. It refers to someone who is pretending to change but deep down        remains the same as before, and does so out of opportunism in order to       maintain        a position of power and privilege in a world that is entering a new phase.              For those wondering whatever big cat can be associated to this kind of very        specific behaviour, the answer is: none. The term actually comes from Il       Gattopardo,        the famous novel by Sicilian writer Giuseppe Tomasi di Lampedusa (note that a        lowercase di in an Italian surname usually indicates nobility, while the       uppercase        Di does not), later adapted into a star-studded movie by another aristocrat,        Luchino Visconti. The titular character, prince Fabrizio Salina, is a member       of        the Sicilian landed aristocracy; like the author’s, his family’s coat of       arms        features a crowned gattopardo, which also works in the story as a metaphor for        power and fierceness.              Sicily has produced some of the best Italian literature, but also the most        pessimistic, with its recurring themes of the futility of idealism and       rebellion,        societal pressure on the individual and resignation to injustice. In Il       Gattopardo,        the young aristocrat Tancredi fights as one of Garibaldi’s volunteers during       the        tumultous times of the Risorgimento, the 19th century Italian wars of national        liberation and unification; to his worried uncle don Fabrizio he explains:        “If we want everything to stay the same, everything must change.”              If I am to give an update about the current Italian government and its       immigration        policy, I want to begin with this quote. Whether it’s actually true or not,       it        symbolises a recurring theme in our history and self-image. It might be       misleading:        many things have changed in Italy over the last couple centuries. But if we       consider        the quote’s context, it becomes fitting to this particular situation. For as       Tancredi        understood, some historical changes are unstoppable no matter how much one       might wish        otherwise; adaptation, not resistance, is the only way to ride the wave and       come out        on top.              Upper classes survive when they understand and do this; when they know how to       pander        to popular worries and aspirations while they look for ways in which their       privileges        can be preserved in a changing world. And this is why a right-wing government       was        always going to pretend to do something to stop mass migration, which       disproportionally        affects the lower classes, while implicitly reassuring their most monied       supporters        they will keep profiting from it – that things will stay the same.              When Giorgia Meloni’s far-right Fratelli d’Italia “won” the Italian       elections, I wrote        for TOP an explanation of what I believed was one of the major factors       affecting the        results: the exasperation of many Italians with out of control mass migration.       One        regret I have is not making it clearer that I thought that, in spite of her       bombastic        statements of intent, she wasn’t actually going to do much about it. I       don’t like to        engage in what in Italian we call processo alle intenzioni, that is judging       people on        what we think they are going to do, rather than what they actually do.              Meloni still insists she will do something, but I think it’s pretty clear at       this point        that she will not. Even if she was honest about her intentions, and I think       she mostly        was, her hands are tied – by the other parties she shares the government       with, by        international norms, the European Union, the business lobbies, the Vatican and        finally public opinion.              Giorgia Meloni’s most famous policy proposal in this respect was a “naval       blockade”        of Italian coasts – that was never going to happen. The most she’s done is       some        confusing action with boats carrying migrants that has made it slightly harder       for        them to offload their human cargo rapidly. This has gotten us into a       diplomatic row        with the French government, which is constantly trying to offload unwanted       migrants        onto its neighbours, but displays outrage when Italy does the same (France,       with a        migration and segregation problem of its own making, is also a bit of a       cautionary        tale for us).              Without going into the many specific solutions suggested or tentatively       implemented        by European countries, ranging from deporting migrants to Rwanda to paying       them to        go back home to building barbed wire fences with police on the “in” side,       the problem        is that if any Western government was actually serious about stopping mass       migration        it would have to engage in policies so harsh, so unflinching, so deadly,       actually,        that public opinion, the courts, the media, religious and thought leaders       would        simply not allow them – in Western Europe especially. Not only that: a       significant        portion of public opinion is in favour of letting people come in as much as       they want to.              The debate flared up in February 2023 after the shipwreck in Cutro, in the       Southern        region of Calabria – over seventy people lost their lives, including many       children.        The usual charade of finger-pointing followed. Was it the fault of the       government?        Of the ruthless human traffickers who cram people onto boats and abandon them       at sea?        Of the lack of legal paths to immigration? Of the Wagner group? (A minister       has even        said this, and why not? It’s not like Russia and Belarus haven’t used       migration as a        weapon already…).              I must admit that, hearing about the shipwreck, I felt anger even more than       sadness.        This keeps happening – not just to Italy, or Greece. The Mediterranean is a       shared sea,        small, crowded, diverse, a sea that has always been a bridge more than a wall.       And now        our beautiful Mediterranean has become a watery graveyard. This has to stop.       But how?              Letting everyone in is out of the question. Pakistan alone has almost four       times the        population of Italy, Bangladesh almost three times (these countries and       Afghanistan               [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca