home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.politics.economics      "Its the economy, stupid"      345,374 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 343,877 of 345,374   
   davidp to All   
   Insurers Are in the Hot Seat on Climate    
   21 Jul 23 12:50:52   
   
   From: lessgovt@gmail.com   
      
   Insurers Are in the Hot Seat on Climate Change   
   By Jean Eaglesham, July 13, 2023, WSJ   
   Insurers are caught in the crossfire of an escalating battle over climate   
   change.  The biggest U.S. insurance firms are facing pressure from 3 sides.   
   They are raising premiums and are cutting back coverage because of more   
   damaging storms and wildfires,    
   made worse by climate change. They insure the fossil-fuel producers whose   
   products are blamed for causing climate change. And, as big investors, they   
   fund these same companies. Most try to promote their climate bona fides.   
      
   This is a recipe for making lots of powerful people unhappy. Texas lawmakers   
   want to ensure that insurance companies “do not hinder” oil companies.   
   Connecticut lawmakers want the opposite. Republican state attorneys general   
   accuse insurers of going    
   too far in the fight against climate change. Democratic senators are asking if   
   the companies are going far enough.   
      
   “We’re caught right in the middle between these very different agendas,”   
   said David Sampson, head of the American Property Casualty Insurance   
   Association, an industry group. “What we’re seeing is the weaponization of   
   the business of insurance…   
   to [try to] achieve certain public policy objectives.”   
      
   Adding to their stress, many insurance companies are struggling with losses   
   because of severe weather, inflation, supply-chain bottlenecks and other   
   factors. They are pushing up rates significantly for some types of coverage.    
      
   Public Citizen, a consumer group, called Farmers Insurance’s move this week   
   to restrict sales of homeowners policies in California and Florida a “prime   
   example of the insurance industry’s hypocrisy on climate change.”   
      
   Activists say insurers are giving priority to short-term profits from fossil   
   fuels over their concern for the planet. “The claims by the insurance   
   industry that they are addressing climate change is like tobacco companies   
   saying they care about peoples   
    health,” said Tom Swan, executive director of Connecticut Citizen Action   
   Group.   
      
   Insurers counter that they shouldn’t be forced to deny coverage to   
   legitimate companies, said Sampson of the industry group. The reasons for the   
   pullback from home insurance are more complicated than simply an increase in   
   bad weather driven by climate    
   change, he added, saying there is “runaway lawsuit abuse” in Florida and a   
   regulatory “dysfunctional marketplace” in California. A Farmers spokesman   
   declined to comment.   
      
   Allstate, which recently stopped offering new home-insurance policies in   
   California, says climate change poses three main risks for it as a company:   
   higher losses, a drop in the value of investments in exposed sectors such as   
   oil and gas, and    
   reputational risk. “Climate change matters deeply to internal and external   
   stakeholders,” the insurer’s website says.   
      
   That reputational danger hit the U.S. insurer Liberty Mutual Insurance in   
   2021, when its ownership of an Australian coal mine created a furor among   
   climate and local community groups. Liberty dropped plans to develop the mine   
   and has since quietly sold    
   it, according to a spokeswoman. It has reduced its coal investments by more   
   than 86% since 2019, according to its website.    
      
   The company is still criticized by the climate group Insure Our Future as   
   being one of the “insurers of last resort” willing to underwrite new coal   
   projects, as well as being a major oil and gas insurer. Coal is considered   
   among the dirtiest fossil    
   fuels because it produces higher quantities of carbon dioxide when it is   
   burned.    
      
   The spokeswoman for Liberty Mutual said it offers policies “to meet the   
   realities and demands of today’s economy.” As an insurer, Liberty Mutual   
   “understands the risks posed by a changing climate” and is supporting its   
   customers as they    
   transition to a low-carbon economy, she added.      
      
   In contrast to Liberty Mutual, more than 40 global insurers have restricted   
   coverage for coal in the past five years or so, according to the Insure Our   
   Future campaigners. That has squeezed the choice available and pushed up   
   premiums, companies say.   
      
   Eric Francia, CEO of the Philippine energy company ACEN, said insurance costs   
   for its former coal plant more than quadrupled over the past four to five   
   years. ACEN in November sold the plant in a deal that commits to cutting its   
   50-year operating life in    
   half. Since then, “We are getting significantly more interest from   
   insurers,” he said.     
      
   Many overseas insurers are restricting coverage for oil and gas projects,   
   although few U.S. insurers apply such curbs. An exception is Chubb’s demand   
   this year that oil and gas producers cut methane emissions.    
      
   Such initiatives are coming under criticism from the campaign by conservatives   
   against financial firms’ use of environmental, social and corporate   
   governance, or ESG, criteria.   
      
   The campaign began against mutual funds that used these criteria to pick   
   stocks. For insurers, the situation is more complicated since the risks they   
   face are more concrete.    
      
   A new Texas law bars insurers from charging different rates based on ESG   
   factors alone. But it still allows them to charge more where there is a higher   
   risk “that may be tied to climate,” such as locating an oil refinery on   
   the hurricane-prone Gulf    
   Coast, said Tom Oliverson, the Republican chair of the Texas House Insurance   
   Committee.   
      
   Some blue states appear headed in the opposite direction. A Connecticut bill   
   this year proposed a 5% surcharge on “any premium payments from any fossil   
   fuel company” to any insurer licensed in the state. The proposed legislation   
   hasn’t gone to a    
   vote.   
      
   California holds a unique place in the debate. The state is a leader in   
   addressing climate change, but insurers say its regulations have made it hard   
   for them to raise rates to address the risk of wildfires. Several major   
   insurers have restricted    
   coverage in the state after suffering big losses. Michael Soller, deputy   
   insurance commissioner, says California “recognizes the impact of climate   
   change” and is spending billions of dollars to try to reduce the wildfire   
   risk.     
      
   Opposition from Republicans in the U.S. is spilling overseas. The threat of an   
   antitrust lawsuit against insurers who joined forces to cut carbon emissions   
   effectively disbanded the United Nations-sponsored group.    
      
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca