Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.politics.economics    |    "Its the economy, stupid"    |    345,379 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 344,249 of 345,379    |
|    davidp to All    |
|    =?UTF-8?Q?What_you_should_know_=E2=80=93    |
|    29 Aug 23 17:06:23    |
      From: lessgovt@gmail.com              What you should know – but didn’t know to ask – about overshoot and the       ‘population question’       By William Rees, Aug 29, 2023, The Overpopulation Project              What would you think if someone called you out as a ‘dissipative       structure’? Or better, claimed that you were a ‘thermodynamically       far-from-equilibrium dissipative structure’? Chances are, you wouldn’t       know whether to be offended or to ready        yourself to accept congratulations—not many people have ever heard the term       ‘dissipative structure.’              This is unfortunate because you actually are a dissipative structure—in       fact, the entire human enterprise acts as a single massive dissipative       structure. And, it turns out, understanding the workings of dissipative       structures shines a whole new light        on human ecological overshoot including global heating.              This is just one of the novel arguments in a new paper on the human ecology of       overshoot in which I explain why a major population ‘correction’ in this       century is inevitable. Simply put, overshoot means that there are too many       people consuming and        polluting too much; we are using the living Earth faster than ecosystems can       regenerate. Thus, the purpose of the article was to make the case, on novel       grounds, that: a) the sheer number of humans and the scale of economic       activity are undermining the        functional integrity of the ecosphere and; b) left unattended, this reality       will precipitate a global economic and population contraction – i.e.,       civilizational collapse—later in this century. The following outlines the       core of my argument.              A rather unsettling premise of the piece is that the human eco-predicament is,       in many respects, wholly ‘natural’, the product of human evolutionary       success gone awry. Innate expansionist behaviours that were advantageous in       Paleolithic (pre-       agricultural) environments have become maladaptive in today’s globalized       industrialized environment. Why is this significant? Because society seems       unwilling to recognize that H. sapiens is a still-evolving species subject to       the same natural laws and        forces affecting the evolution of all living organisms. It is entirely       conceivable for modern civilization to be ‘selected out’ by an       increasingly hostile environment of our own making. Policies and programs that       attempt to ‘fix’ overshoot        without attempting to override humanity’s now destructive expansionist       tendencies are doomed to fail.              Which brings us back to ‘dissipative structures’—just what are they and       where do they fit in? A dissipative structure is a self-producing system that       develops and grows by extracting useful energy/matter from its environment and       ‘dissipating’        it back into that environment as useless waste. (Isn’t that what your body       does?) Dissipative structures form spontaneously in the natural world in       response to concentrations or steep gradients of energy/matter. Indeed (and       this is important), a        dissipative structure can persist only as long as the energy gra       ient/concentration exists.              I now have to introduce a somewhat peculiar characteristic of human beings.       People tend to ‘socially construct’ their own realities—religious       doctrines, economic models, political ideologies, scientific theories,       etc.—and then live out of their        constructs as if they were real. Obviously, a social construct is valid or       true only to the extent that it faithfully reflects any aspect of biophysical       reality that it purports to represent.              From this perspective, neoliberal economics—the brand of economics currently       running the world—is a problematically quirky social construct. Neoliberal       models start from the assumptions that the economy and ‘the environment’       are separate systems        and that human ingenuity (i.e., technology) can substitute for any product or       process of nature. (They certainly make no reference to dissipative       structures.) It is an easy leap from the neoliberal paradigm for the world to       believe in the perpetual        growth of the human enterprise abetted by continuously advancing technology.              But what if the neoliberal construct is totally wrong-headed? What if the       human enterprise, far from floating in splendid isolation, is actually a       fully-contained, wholly-dependent, growing subsystem of the non-growing       ecosphere, as ecological economist        Herman Daly consistently argued? Suddenly, the concept of dissipative       structures takes on ominous meaning.              Ecologists recognize that living systems exist in nested hierarchies of       dissipative structures (picture Russian Matryoshka dolls). Each sub-system in       the hierarchy self-organizes and grows by extracting available energy and       matter from concentrations in        its host ‘environment’ one level up. It processes this useful       energy/matter internally to produce and maintain its own complex       structure/function and exports—dissipates—useless, degraded energy and       material wastes back into its host.              If something is fully dissipated, it is completely disordered; there are no       concentrations or gradients, nothing can happen. Physicists refer to this as a       state of maximum entropy. All things in nature tend to become more randomly       ordered (increase in        entropy) unless a source of energy is used to reverse this trend. But this       energy always comes from the dissipation of another thing, such as the sun       gradually burning itself out, or the food we digest. If the degree of disorder       is referred to as entropy,        then ‘negentropy’ denotes the degree of order. In effect, living entities       (cells, individuals, species, ecosystems) raise themselves from static,       disordered near equilibrium states to highly-ordered, functional       far-from-equilibrium states but can do        so only at the expense of increasing ‘global’ entropy, particularly the       entropy of their immediate host systems.                     [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca