Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.politics.economics    |    "Its the economy, stupid"    |    345,374 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 344,542 of 345,374    |
|    davidp to All    |
|    WHY DIDN'T THE EUROPEANS ENSLAVE OR AT L    |
|    01 Nov 23 13:10:13    |
      From: lessgovt@gmail.com              WHY DIDN'T THE EUROPEANS ENSLAVE OR AT LEAST ATTEMPT TO ENSLAVE PEOPLE OTHER       THAN THE AFRICANS?       answered by Michael B., Programmer at A Healthcare Company, July 17       They did. The whites kept running away and the natives kept dying.       Slavery is an old institution. It was once considered a rather humane one.       Rather than killing all your conquered foes you could instead enslave them.       And this form of slavery was practiced all over the world in antiquity. In       fact, it was so common and        unremarkable that the Old Testament contains laws governing the treatment of       slaves.       The early Christians considered slavery a barbaric and pagan institution. By       the Middle Ages slavery had become outlawed in Europe. It was instead replaced       with serfdom. Which is almost completely identical except that you can’t       sell a serf. Just the        land they live on.       When the Europeans conquered America they conveniently forgot the religious       prohibitions on slavery and attempted to enslave the Native Americans. They       ran into two problems. The first is that the Americas were currently       undergoing a mass extinction        event as a result of every single plague to ever hit Eurasia hitting all at       once. So their slaves kept dying.       And the 2nd is that the European colonies represented a small foothold into       the Americas. So a crafty slave could simply escape. Maybe not to their       original tribe, but to at least a neighboring one.       Then they attempted to enslave white people. They called it “indentured       servitude”. A poor person would book passage to America on credit, or a       criminal would be sent as punishment. On arrival their contract would be       purchased by a landowner, and        they would be legally obligated to work for them for X number of years to pay       their passage off.       But a white person could just run away and start a new life in another colony       under an assumed name. And even if they didn’t indentured servitude was       temporary.       Then someone hit on the idea of taking slaves from Africa. At the time       Europeans couldn’t really survive in sub-Saharan Africa. We hadn’t       invented a cure for Malaria yet. But Africa was politically fragmented,       technologically backwards, and had a        culture that already practiced slavery.       Thus emerged the triangular trade. Raw materials would be shipped from the       Americas to Europe. Manufactured goods, such as guns, would be shipped to       Africa, where they would be exchanged for slaves. And those slaves would be       shipped to America.       The end result was even further destabilization of Africa as those tribes that       did business with the Europeans now had even more incentive to take slaves,       and even better tools to do it with.       But the Africans made for perfect slaves. They had been exposed to all the       same diseases as Europeans. They were immediately identifiable, at least for       the first few generations. And it’s not like they could run away across an       ocean.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca