Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.politics.economics    |    "Its the economy, stupid"    |    345,374 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 344,622 of 345,374    |
|    davidp to All    |
|    Sounds like "Tail wagging the dog!" (1/3    |
|    11 Dec 23 21:25:27    |
      From: lessgovt@gmail.com              What Is Happening at the Columbia School of Social Work?       By Pamela Paul, Dec. 7, 2023, NY Times       During orientation at the Columbia School of Social Work at Columbia       University, the country’s oldest graduate program for aspiring social       workers, students are given a glossary with “100+ common terms you may see       or hear used in class, during        discussions and at your field placements.”              Among the A’s: “agent and target of oppression” (“members of the       dominant social groups privileged by birth or acquisition, who consciously or       unconsciously abuse power against the members or targets of oppressed       groups”) and “       Ashkenormativity” (“a system of oppression that favors white Jewish folx,       based on the assumption that all Jewish folx are Ashkenazi, or from Western       Europe”).              The C’s define “capitalism” as “a system of economic oppression based       on class, private property, competition and individual profit. See also:       carceral system, class, inequality, racism.” “Colonization” is “a       system of oppression based on        invasion and control that results in institutionalized inequality between the       colonizer and the colonized. See also: Eurocentric, genocide, Indigeneity,       oppression.”              These aren’t the definitions you’d find in Webster’s dictionary, and       until recently they would not have been much help in getting a master’s in       social work at an Ivy League university. They reflect a shift not just at       Columbia but in the field of        social work, in which the social justice framework that has pervaded much of       academia has affected the approach of top schools and the practice of social       work itself.              Will radicalized social workers be providing service not just based on the       needs of their clients but also to advance their political beliefs and assess       clients based on their race or ethnicity?              When a student group, Columbia Social Workers 4 Palestine, announced a       teach-in about “the significance of the Palestinian counteroffensive on Oct.       7 and the centrality of revolutionary violence to anti-imperialism,” Mijal       Bitton, a Jewish spiritual        leader, asked on X, “Imagine receiving services from a Columbia-educated       social worker who believes burning families, killing babies, and gang-raping       women is a ‘counteroffensive’ and ‘revolutionary violence [central] to       anti-imperialism.’”        Administrators barred the event from the school, but organizers held it in the       lobby on Wednesday. Ariana Pinsker-Lehrer, a first-year student, set the       protesters straight. “You’re studying to be social workers,” she told       the group, “do better.”              Since the time of the pioneering activist and reformer Jane Addams, social       work has been guided by a sense of mission. Social workers, who are the most       common providers of mental health care, as well as the people who carry out       social service programs,        help the country’s neediest people. Whether social workers are caseworkers       in government agencies or — as is the case with most Columbia graduates, I       was told — therapists or counselors in private practice, their clients are       often the elderly, the        poor, veterans, homeless people, people with substance abuse issues and       domestic violence survivors.              According to the National Association of Social Workers, “The primary       mission of the social work profession is to enhance human well-being and help       meet basic and complex needs of all people, with a particular focus on those       who are vulnerable,        oppressed and living in poverty.”              Other leading schools, like the Crown Family School of Social Work, Policy and       Practice at the University of Chicago and the School of Social Work at the       University of Michigan, have embraced social justice goals but without as       sharp an ideological        expression as Columbia.              The Columbia School of Social Work updated its mission statement in 2022 to       say that its purpose is “to interrogate racism and other systems of       oppression standing in the way of social equity and justice and to foster       social work education, practice        and research that strengthen and expand the opportunities, resources and       capabilities of all persons to achieve their full potential and well-being.”       What was once its central mission — to enhance the world of social work —       now follows an emphatic        political statement.              Melissa Begg, the dean of the Columbia School of Social Work, said that while       the school’s mission has always been about social justice and “equitable       access,” its mission has evolved because “racism is part of the       country.” The school, she        explained, is trying to build an awareness of and give students the tools they       need to address a diverse range of needs. As she put it, “If you think of       slavery as the original sin of the United States, it makes sense to center       that reality as part of        the school’s mission.”              In 2017 the Columbia social work school introduced a framework around power,       race, oppression and privilege, which the school called PROP. This began as a       formal course for all first-year students to create what Begg referred to as       “self-awareness.”        In subsequent years, the PROP framework was applied to the entire curriculum       of the school, and the PROP class became a required course called Foundations       of Social Work Practice: Decolonizing Social Work.              According to the course’s current syllabus, work “will be centered on an       anti-Black racism framework” and “will also involve examinations of the       intersectionality of issues concerning L.B.G.T.Q.I.A.+ rights, Indigenous       people/First Nations people        and land rights, Latinx representation, xenophobia, Islamophobia, undocumented       immigrants, Japanese internment camps, indigent white communities (Appalachia)       and antisemitism with particular attention given to the influence of       anti-Black racism on all        previously mentioned systems.”                     [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca