Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.politics.economics    |    "Its the economy, stupid"    |    345,374 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 344,758 of 345,374    |
|    Gavin -that idiot- Newsom to All    |
|    California Legislature rejects many of G    |
|    14 Jun 24 14:00:28    |
      XPost: alt.california, talk.politics.guns, sac.politics       XPost: or.politics       From: incompetent.democrat.asshole.pelosi.too@sacbee.com              SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — The California Legislature on Thursday rejected       many of Gov. Gavin Newsom’s most difficult budget cuts, choosing instead to       speed-up a temporary tax increase on some businesses to help address an       estimated $45 billion deficit while preserving spending on many social       safety net programs.              The budget lawmakers approved is not the state’s final spending plan. Newsom       and legislative leaders are still negotiating how to fix the shortfall       before the start of the new fiscal year on July 1. But lawmakers had to pass       a balanced budget by Saturday or else they would forfeit their six-figure       salaries — a rule voters approved in 2010 to prevent the types of budget       stalemates that had delayed negotiations in the past.              That is why Thursday’s vote was not really a public rebuke of Newsom, a       Democrat who for the most part has had a good relationship with a       Legislature dominated by members of his own party. Instead, the vote       highlights the differences between Newsom, a second-term governor who many       believe holds presidential aspirations, and a liberal state Legislature that       is often more willing to take risks.              While Newsom’s budget proposal preserved most of the state’s major       assistance programs, he included a number of smaller cuts that angered his       Democratic allies. He proposed to stop paying for in-home caretakers for       some disabled immigrants on Medicaid. He wants to eliminate a program that       helps provide housing for families with incomes less than $13,000 per year.       And he suggested delaying a rate increase for organizations that care for       people with intellectual disabilities.              To reject these cuts, lawmakers needed to find more money. They found it by       taking one of Newsom’s ideas and making it happen faster.              Newsom proposed temporarily stopping some businesses from deducting       financial losses from their state taxable income, thus increasing their tax       bill. It has become a common way to increase revenue during budget       shortfalls. The Legislature chose to do this, too, but their plan would       start the tax increase one year earlier. That generated an extra $5 billion       in revenue compared with Newsom’s plan.              Lawmakers also found large budget cuts in other places. They want to cut $1       billion out of the state’s prison budget, arguing the money isn’t needed       now       that the prison population is about half of what it was two decades ago. And       they want to cancel a $400 million loan to PG&E that would help extend the       life of the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant.              Those are just some of the disagreements that the Newsom administration and       lawmakers must resolve by the end of the month. On Thursday, both sides       indicated they have made good progress. Senate President Pro Tempore Mike       McGuire said lawmakers could be voting on a final budget deal by the end of       next week.              “I firmly believe the final budget that we’re going to have in front of us       here next week will follow the same framework that’s in front of this body       here today,” he said.              One major issue that has yet to be addressed by either side is what to do       about a minimum wage increase for health care workers that is scheduled to       start on July 1. Newsom signed a law last year that would eventually raise       health care workers’ minimum wage to $25 per hour over the next decade.              The wage increase is expected to cost the state hundreds of millions of       dollars in increased wages for some state workers and increased payments in       the state’s Medicaid program, according to an analysis by the University of       California-Berkeley Labor Center. Newsom has said he wants to delay the       minimum wage increase, but he so far has been unable to get an agreement       from the state Legislature.              Republicans, who don’t have enough numbers to sway policy decisions and say       they were left out of the budget negotiations with Democrats, criticized the       Legislature’s spending plan as unsustainable.              Republican Assemblymember Heath Flora said raising taxes on businesses to       help close the deficit would be “an economy killer,” adding “our citizens       are not here to provide overdraft protections.”              “We can’t continue to make up the lie that tax increases are a solution to       bad management,” he said.              Democratic state Sen. Scott Wiener defended the tax proposal, noting it was       just seven years ago that Congress slashed the federal corporate tax rate by       40%.              “All we are asking here during a difficult budget year is to be part of the       solution,” Wiener said. “This is a very reasonable approach.”              https://apnews.com/article/california-legislature-budget-gov-gavin-newsom-       d0ecb7821c2fb5a02ab46cb1bad6bd8c              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca