Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.politics.economics    |    "Its the economy, stupid"    |    345,374 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 344,764 of 345,374    |
|    Gavin -that idiot- Newsom to All    |
|    California's budget charade reflects a 1    |
|    14 Jun 24 20:17:05    |
      XPost: alt.california, talk.politics.guns, sac.politics       XPost: or.politics       From: incompetent.democrat.asshole.pelosi.too@sacbee.com              What’s happening on the state budget this week — or, more accurately, not       happening — is the latest chapter in a 15-year-long saga of manipulative       Capitol politics.              Sometime before Saturday night, the Legislature will pass what its leaders       will claim is a state budget for the 2024-25 fiscal year that begins on July       1. Saturday is the June 15 constitutional deadline, and if legislators don’t       comply with it, they theoretically could forfeit their paychecks.              However, the budget will only pay lip service to the California       Constitution, and may bear only a passing resemblance to the budget that       will finally emerge sometime later.              Understanding why this charade exists requires turning the clock back to       2009, when a Republican governor, Arnold Schwarzenegger, was sparring with       Democratic legislative leaders over a budget that was hammered by the Great       Recession and had been tied up in partisan wrangling for months.              Budgets then required two-thirds votes in the Legislature, which meant they       needed support from at least a few GOP legislators. A Republican state       senator, Abel Maldonado, refused to cast the decisive vote unless Democrats       agreed to place a measure on the 2010 ballot that would overhaul       California’s primary election system.              At the time, nominees were chosen via primaries within the parties.       Maldonado, backed by Schwarzenegger, wanted to switch to a jungle primary       system in which all candidates — regardless of party — would appear on the       same primary ballot, and the top two vote-getters would qualify for a       runoff.              Leaders of both parties hated the change, but Democrats finally caved and       placed Proposition 14 on the ballot.              “Most Californians are neither far-left nor far-right, but in the middle,”       Schwarzenegger said. “We will no longer punish candidates and elected       officials for putting the people first, in front of partisan politics.”              He later made Maldonado lieutenant governor when the office became vacant.              Democrats seethed about being forced to accept the top-two primary to get a       budget deal and vowed never to let it happen again. With labor union allies,       they immediately qualified another ballot measure, Proposition 25, which       lowered the vote requirement for budgets to a simple majority. The measure       basically cut Republicans out of the budget process, and included a       sweetener to attract voters, declaring that legislators’ salaries would be       docked if they didn’t enact a budget by June 15.              Just a year later, that proviso was tested when Jerry Brown, who had       returned to the governorship after a 28-year absence, vetoed the 2011-12       budget passed by the Legislature, saying “it continues big deficits for       years to come and adds billions of dollars of new debt.”              Democratic state Controller John Chiang immediately blocked legislators’       paychecks, costing them about $400 a day. A couple of weeks later, a new       budget was passed and signed by Brown and paychecks were issued.              However, the incident outraged legislative leaders, who sued Chiang and       later won judicial a ruling that if the Legislature passed a budget by June       15, even if incomplete, they could keep their salaries.              That’s why legislators will pass a budget this week that is far from final,       but the threat of losing their paychecks is only theoretical.              What is real is that Gov. Gavin Newsom and legislative leaders are at odds       on some fairly significant aspects of the budget, particularly his proposed       reductions in many state programs to help cover a $44.9 billion deficit.       Legislators want to reduce prison spending and raise some taxes on business       to rescind Newsom’s cuts.              https://calmatters.org/commentary/2024/06/california-budget-charade-       conflict-process/              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca