Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.politics.marijuana    |    They hate government but love a pot-tax    |    2,468 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,044 of 2,468    |
|    Democracy is not real - need for ec to All    |
|    Democracy is not real - need for economi    |
|    05 Sep 04 07:44:44    |
      From: Tq9@p8W.com              Welcome to another edition of PROUT Gems. In this issue:       ** The return of the Authoritarian Right and a proposal for Economic       Decentralisation       ** Economic democracy       ** Decentralized economy       ** Automation: doom or boon?       ** POLITICIANS              Democracy is not real without economic democracy for all. This issue again       covers the importance of economic democracy which should be the platform of       all progressive and humanistic social change movements. Without that       platform, the perpetuation of economic centralisation in the hands of either       Corporate Capitalism or State Capitalism (communism) will persist. The       future of humanity cannot rely on the immoral forces behind these systems to       take society forward. Deprivation of others of their due as human beings is       immoral and both Corporate Capitalism and Communism have that mentality.              Regards              Dharma                     ** The return of the Authoritarian Right and a proposal for Economic       Decentralisation       -Prout Research Institute              According to the doctrine of laissez-faire (unfettered) capitalism to which       Bush Jnr subscribes, the way to avoid economic slumps or recessions is to       give maximum encouragement to the rich and super-rich to keep the economy       going strong. The theory goes that once the economy is going well, a hidden       hand redistributes the wealth to the poor. The real question is, does this       invisible hand really exist?              In 'Tone Poem' by Midnight Oil (Moginie, Garrett) it is appropriately       described as:              invisible hand clutching at the throat       statistical sham an emperor's rags its sad       because equality's the only plea green fields are burning       the reefs on fire and bellies are swollen they're hurting       a willing victim I don't think so       we won't be pinned against the wall       there is no slogan that can feed you              The question now arises: What are the alternatives? The central problem is       the existence of a capitalist mode of production and its inherent       exploitative contradictions (alienation, materialism, unemployment,       homelessness, strengthening of racism and patriarchy and destruction of       ecology, etc).              Liberal politics essentially harbour illusions. Many simply seek to retain       the concept of selfish pleasure without a proper psychological consideration       of higher human needs. Liberal Democracy is based on economic and political       centralisation. Political Liberal Democracy is seen to have won the day       through its representative style of governance. Few people have questioned       its integrity until recently. Today if we ask the sections of any society,       who are disadvantaged or left behind in economic prosperity, they are not       enthusiastic about the supposed advantages of Liberal Democracy. And in the       developing countries, where the gap between rich and poor has grown even       more, people are desperate.              The main problems of political democracy are party politics and high       election advertising expenditure that requires backing from Big Capital.       Most people vote for the party and not the candidate and electors depend on       wealthy backers to pay for campaign adverts. So it is clear that       capitalists favour Liberal Democracy as they can bribe, intimidate and       manipulate the people and those who they elect through money power. Liberal       Democracy promises peace, equality and prosperity, in reality it puts the       common people at the mercy of Big Capital, and they spend the best part of       lives working for pitiful wages.              According to Prout there are several prerequisites for a proper democratic       system and these include:        - politicians of a high moral character who seriously study the ethical       dimensions of their decisions        - thorough education of voters which creates a high social consciousness       (of social, economic and political issues)              People are fed up with false promises, they want real Democracy, Economic       Democracy, where they can really control their lives!              Economic Democracy requires economic decentralisation. This is based on a       Co-operative mode of production and distribution together with an       anti-nationalist and pro-universalist outlook. Universalism stands for love       for all, not just human existence but for all life and the natural world, it       is also about celebrating the diversity of life. Something only given lip       service to in materialist conceptions of society.              Political power can remain centralised and economic power is decentralised.       Political power is with ethical politicians and economic power is with the       local population. The main work of the people with political power is to       remove all the       political obstacles that prevent the peoples' economic needs being met. Due       to the limits of physical wealth on this planet, a system like Economic       Democracy will ensure that this wealth is rationally distributed. While       there is room for those who work harder to enjoy higher wages, there should       never be a situation like there is today, in the USA for example, where 5%       of the population owns 95% of the wealth.              Therefore under Economic Democracy, production is for consumption rather       than for profit. This guarantees basic necessities for all, like education,       health, and proper housing. Capitalists would never agree to economic       decentralisation, as they would lose their control over production and       distribution and thus control of surplus value profit. And likewise, the old       communists, as in the previous USSR, would never have supported economic       decentralisation for the same reason. Their communist system was really a       kind of State Capitalism.              Economic decentralisation means developing the local industry. Under an       Economic Democratic system, the Constitution of every country must guarantee       the minimum requirements of people (which will be progressive and increase       with time) including food, clothing, housing, education and health care.       This will be accomplished by full employment because all will have adequate       and increasing purchasing capacity, which will in turn make the society more       dynamic and unleash the potentiality of the people and make economic       decentralisation more and more innovative.              The local Co-operative system will ensure that proper planning and the       reinvestment of surplus profits (through wages, bonuses, dividends to       shareholder-workers) will keep the economy dynamic and growing. The surplus       profits should not get monopolised by small elites within that locality or       from outside, which is the real reason behind a stagnated economy. Economic       Democracy is also the best system for protection of the environment and       animals. As production is for consumption and not for excessive profits,       more consideration will go into preserving the ecological balance.              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca