home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.politics.marijuana      They hate government but love a pot-tax      2,468 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 1,171 of 2,468   
   Jeffrey to Theorem   
   Re: TAKE ACTION TO LEGALIZE DRUGS NOW!!   
   10 Mar 05 16:52:53   
   
   From: Jeffreykn@bellsouth.net   
      
   Theorem, you are actually jumping to far into the future, b/c the Supreme   
   Court has not handed down a decision regarding marijuana possession in   
   relation to the commerce clause.  Only the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has   
   rendered a decision supporting your position.  If anybody is interested the   
   case on this issue is:   
           Raich v. Ashcroft, 352 F.3d 1222 (9th Cir. 2003)   
   You can also search the U.S. Supreme Court website for the proceedings   
   currently pending, use No. 03-1454, to find the case.   
   Have fun.  Interesting reading.   
      
      
   "Theorem"  wrote in message   
   news:111bn6s4r6ui0e2@news.supernews.com...   
   > Cashew wrote:   
   >> On 13 Feb 2005 23:09:45 -0800, "The Zen One"    
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>Thank you for reading my post and my webpage, and thank you even more   
   >>>for your post in reply.   
   >>>   
   >>>Thank you also for the recommendation to reformat the web page. I'll   
   >>>get that page reformatted in a few days.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> And I suggest you point out that laws regarding marijuana should be at   
   >> the state and local levels just as they are with alcohol.   
   >>   
   >> The federal gov't has no business usurping this right from the   
   >> individual states.   
   >   
   > No business and no right. The commerce clause does not give the feds any   
   > power over activities wholly within a state's borders. That means that you   
   > and I are free (legally, technically, at the federal level) to grow and   
   > smoke marijuana at home, as long as we don't distribute it across state   
   > lines. If the states want to regulate use, it's their right to do so.   
   >   
   > The challenges to the Controlled Substances Act have been way off the   
   > mark. The simple fact is that the federal government has no constitutional   
   > power to regulate intra-state use, only inter-state commerce (hyphens   
   > added for emphasis).   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca