Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.politics.marijuana    |    They hate government but love a pot-tax    |    2,468 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,261 of 2,468    |
|    Holliston Perni to All    |
|    OT: Another Perspective on Gun Control    |
|    10 Sep 05 10:42:01    |
      From: hperni@AmericanJunta.com               Let's get something straight from the outset: The intent of the       Second Amendment is not to allow hunters to indulge in their favorite sport.       It is not about target shooting, or even about protecting your life and       property from muggers and other Ne'er-do-wells. The second amendment is       about protecting our freedom from an overbearing government when it gets too       big for its britches.              Lest we forget, the founding fathers, as they set about framing the       constitution that would create a new country, had just finished wresting       that freedom from a totalitarian government, by force of arms. These were       wise men, who foresaw that governments that cannot be opposed will       inevitably abrogate the rights of citizens in favor of the interests of the       rulers. There is only one thing that prevents a government from trampling on       the rights of its citizens, that is the fear that, pushed too far, they will       fight back.              Kent State, Ruby Ridge, Waco, MOVE . . . we do not have to look far to see       evidence that, unchecked, our government will perpetrate the same abuses       against its people as many other governments have in the past. Moreover, we       also see that our men in uniform--soldiers, National Guard, FBI,       police--will just as happily follow orders to shoot innocent citizens of       their own country as any invading force. the only thing that will give them       pause is the knowledge that some may shoot back.              I consider myself a man of peace. I believe in non-violent solutions when       such are available. However, I am also a realist, and my experience with       those in positions of power provides no basis for believing that those who       lust for power will ever restrain themselves from abusing it. Sadly, my       experience with those who "only follow orders" has, similarly, shown me that       a Nazi is a Nazi, regardless of their uniform, or the particular words with       which they "Seig Hiel!"              As the father of two children, I would very much like them to grow up in a       safe, sane society. I worry about the armed thugs in our inner-city slums;       about rampaging students in our schools; and about the proliferation of       violence in our culture. Unfortunately, disarming the citizens, and granting       irresistible power to the government will not lead to the free country in       which I would like my children to grow up.              Hence, in my opinion, citizens should not only be allowed to arm themselves,       they should be able to achieve parity in armament with those in government,       since they are the ones against whom our freedom must ultimately be       protected.                            Hollis,              http://www.AmericanJunta.com                                                        --       Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service        ------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------       Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca