Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.politics.marijuana    |    They hate government but love a pot-tax    |    2,468 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,726 of 2,468    |
|    W. K. Mahler, Mahlers.Com to All    |
|    & Over Here In Massachusetts About Price    |
|    02 Nov 14 16:09:49    |
      From: williamkeithmahler@gmail.com              Deciding an ideal price for legal marijuana all depends on your priorities.       Here are just some examples of several possible priorities with the likely       impact on price they would have, with the highest prices at the top. The       possible prices I list for each are purely educated guesses, simply designed       to give readers a rough idea of the tradeoff — they could end up being       significantly wrong.              1) Highest price possible that still reduces the black market - (possibly       around $180 an ounce) – It seems this is Kleiman’s preferred choice. The       goal would be to eliminate the black market but also keep prices high to       reduce consumption.              I would like to see experts try to put an exact figure on this, because       there is no one magic number at which the entire black market would       instantly disappear. There remains a very small black market in almost       everything from cheese to laundry detergent. It is more of a sliding scale       based on many factors, so is the goal eliminating 97 percent of the black       market, or would a price that eliminates 85 percent be good enough? In       addition, if marijuana were also legalized in neighboring countries where it       was subjected to a very low tax rate, the local price would potentially need       to be dropped to stop the grey market smuggling of legal marijuana across       the border.              2) The most government revenue possible – (possibly around $120 an ounce) –       The goal here is to soak from the market as much money as the government can       get from it. This might result in a price higher or much lower than the       first option, depending on the demand curve and how much of the black market       remains at a given price. The argument for this option is that the tax       revenue could be used for all sorts of other priorities which may have a       much bigger positive impact on society than any change in marijuana       consumption.              3) Maximize new jobs – (possibly around $100 an ounce) – Taxes aren’t the       only way to keep prices higher. Demanding frequent testing, substantial       security measures and limiting the size of farms all make legal marijuana       more expensive but also end up creating more jobs. The marijuana industry       could be made artificially inefficient, localized, and diverse with the top       goal of making it an indirect jobs program. This might end up creating a       price similar to option two, but with much of the money going to workers and       companies instead of tax payers.              4) Maximizing substitution for more dangerous drugs while discouraging       overuse - (possibly around $60 an ounce) – There is some indication that       people might substitute marijuana for more dangerous drugs for either       medicinal or recreational reasons. A study found opioid deaths dropped       significantly after states legalized medical marijuana. While it would be       hard to determine, it is theoretically possible the optimum price for       overall public health is between option one and the lowest price possible.       The price would have to be low enough to encourage beneficial substitution       while also high enough to discourage some users and still raise sufficient       revenue for public health programs.              5) Whatever it costs to create extremely accurate information or maximum       security – (possibly around $50 an ounce) – The primary thing determining       price could even be some goal separate from tax revenue or demand, like       assuring the most accurate chemical labeling possible or super aggressive       security measures. If the regulator burden was big enough, it could end up       indirectly setting a high floor on the overall price. Under priorities like       these the “ideal” price is whatever it costs for the industry to meet the       goal.              6) The “fair” price relative to alcohol – (possibly around $15 an ounce)       –       Polling shows most adults want to see marijuana taxed and regulated like       alcohol. One could argue the “fair” thing to do is treat marijuana just       like       alcohol by subjecting it to the same relative tax rate and overall       regulatory burden.              7) Let the market decide – (possibly around $6 an ounce) - Several       ideological arguments can be made for allowing the market to mainly decide       the price by subjecting it to only basic regulations. Some people don’t       think it is the government’s place to pick winners, make judgments about       morality, or try to be a “nanny state.”              http://justsaynow.firedoglake.com/2014/10/28/what-price-do-you-w       nt-legal-marijuana-to-sell-for/                            __._,_.___       W. K. Mahler       http://www.mahlers.com              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca