Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.politics.marijuana    |    They hate government but love a pot-tax    |    2,468 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,783 of 2,468    |
|    a425couple to All    |
|    former United States attorney McKay - Ma    |
|    05 Feb 18 09:59:33    |
      XPost: alt.support.marijuana, seattle.politics, or.politics       XPost: ca.politics       From: a425couple@hotmail.com              Marijuana’s true potency and why the law should change              (Yes McKay is a Republican! And he actively worked for       marijuana's legalization in Washington.)              Originally published September 3, 2010 at 2:59 pm Updated September 3,       2010 at 5:01 pm              The U.S. war against marijuana has failed and actually threatens public       safety and rests on false medical assumptions. Guest columnist John       McKay, Seattle's former U.S. attorney, argues why the laws against       marijuana should be changed.              By John McKay       I DON’T smoke pot. And I pretty much think people who do are idiots.              This certainly includes Marc Emery, the self-styled “Prince of Pot” from       Canada whom I indicted in 2005 for peddling marijuana seeds to every       man, woman and child with an envelope and a stamp. Emery recently       pleaded guilty and will be sentenced this month in Seattle, where he       faces five years in federal prison. If changing U.S. marijuana policy       was ever Emery’s goal, the best that can be said is that he took the       wrong path.              As Emery’s prosecutor and a former federal law-enforcement official,       however, I’m not afraid to say out loud what most of my former       colleagues know is true: Our marijuana policy is dangerous and wrong and       should be changed through the legislative process to better protect the       public safety.              Congress has failed to recognize what many already know about our policy       of criminal prohibition of marijuana — it has utterly failed. Listed by       the U.S. government as a “Schedule One” drug alongside heroin, the       demand for marijuana in this country for decades has outpaced the       ability of law enforcement to eliminate it. Perhaps this is because       millions of Americans smoke pot regularly and international drug       cartels, violent gangs and street pushers work hard to reap the profits.              Most Read Stories       What you need to know as tax filing season begins       Amazon rolls out celebs for 90-second Alexa Super Bowl commercial WATCH       ‘This never happens’: International student’s unexpected ordeal ends       with surprise twist       Huskies relaunch program with win over Arizona | Matt Calkins       Washington stuns No. 9 Arizona 78-75 with Dominic Green’s buzzer beater       Unlimited Digital Access. $1 for 4 weeks.       Law-enforcement agencies are simply not capable of interdicting all of       this pot and despite some successes have not succeeded in thwarting       criminals who traffic and sell marijuana. Brave agents and cops continue       to risk their lives in a futile attempt to enforce misguided laws that       do not match the realities of our society.              These same agents and cops, along with prosecutors, judges and jailers,       know we can’t win by arresting all those involved in the massive       importation, growth or distribution of marijuana, nor by locking up all       the pot smokers. While many have argued the policy is unjust, few have       addressed the dangerously potent black market the policy itself has       created for exploitation by Mexican and other international drug cartels       and gangs. With the proceeds from the U.S. marijuana black market, these       criminals distribute dangerous drugs and kill each other (too often       along with innocent bystanders) with American-purchased guns.              Our wrongheaded policy on marijuana has also failed to address the true       health threat posed by its use. While I suspect nothing good can come to       anyone from the chronic ingestion of marijuana smoke, its addictive       quality and health risk pale in comparison with other banned drugs such       as heroin, cocaine or meth. Informed adult choice, albeit a bad one, may       well be preferable to the legal and policy meltdown we have long been       suffering over marijuana.              Not only does our policy directly threaten our public safety and rest       upon false medical assumptions, but our national laws are now in direct       and irreconcilable conflict with state laws, including Washington state.       So called “medical” marijuana reaches precious few patients and backdoor       potheads mock legitimate medical use by glaucoma and chemotherapy       patients. State laws are trumped by federal laws that recognize no such       thing as “medicinal” or “personal” use and are no defense to arrests by       federal agents and prosecution in federal courts.              So the policy is wrong, the law has failed, the public is endangered, no       one in law enforcement is talking about it and precious few policymakers       will honestly face the soft-on-crime sound bite in their next elections.       What should be done?              • First, we need to honestly and courageously examine the true       public-safety danger posed by criminalizing a drug used by millions and       millions of Americans who ignore the law. Marijuana prohibition has       failed — it’s time for a new policy crafted by informed policymakers       with the help of those in law enforcement who have risked their lives       battling pot-purveying drug cartels and gangs.                     • Second, let’s talk about marijuana policy responsibly and with an eye       toward sound science, not myth. We can start by acknowledging that our       1930s-era marijuana prohibition was overkill from the beginning and       should be decoupled from any debate about “legalizing drugs.” We should       study and disclose the findings of the real health risks of prolonged       use, including its influence and effect on juveniles.              • Third, we should give serious consideration to heavy regulation and       taxation of the marijuana industry (an industry that is very real and       dangerously underground). We should limit pot’s content of the active       ingredient THC (tetrahydrocannabinol), regulate its sale to adults who       are dumb enough to want it and maintain criminal penalties for sales,       possession or use by minors, drivers and boaters.              Federal criminal law should give way to regulation, while prohibiting       interstate violation of federal laws consistent with this approach. In       short, policymakers should strive for a regulatory and criminal scheme       like the one guarding that other commodity that failed miserably at       prohibition, alcohol.              As my law-enforcement colleagues know well from chasing bootleggers and       mobsters, this new regulatory and criminal approach will still require       many years of intensive investigation and enforcement before organized       criminal elements are driven from the vast marijuana market. DEA and its       law-enforcement partners must therefore remain well equipped and staffed       to accomplish this task: to protect our families from truly dangerous       drugs and to drive drug cartels, gangs and dope dealers from our society.              John McKay is a law professor at Seattle University and the Marijuana’s       true potency and why the law should change       Originally published September 3, 2010 at 2:59 pm Updated September 3,       2010 at 5:01 pm                            [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca