Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.politics.marijuana    |    They hate government but love a pot-tax    |    2,468 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,900 of 2,468    |
|    buh buh biden to All    |
|    Smoke pouring from holes in Cranley's pl    |
|    30 Mar 22 06:07:02    |
      XPost: talk.politics.guns, oh.general, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh       XPost: sac.politics       From: drooler@gmail.com              John Cranley, a Democrat candidate for governor, announced with a flourish       recently that he intends to rebuild Ohio’s roads and broadband with the       gusher of tax revenues that surely will arrive if Ohio voters legalize the       sale of recreational marijuana this fall.              Ah, the good old days!              I lived through the same fuzzy era of warm promises when Colorado became       the first state to open its doors to retail pot in 2014, and I watched as       the reality simply did not match the hype. Now back home in Ohio I’m       thinking, here we go again.              In Colorado, one of the first people to be disappointed in legalized pot       was Colorado’s own governor (and now Senator) John Hickenlooper.              He was never a fan but he dutifully implemented the law when the voters       passed it on his watch in 2012, and he had two years to prepare the state.              Those tax revenues are “…a drop in the bucket,” he said ruefully after       observing the first four years of the Colorado recreational pot era. “It’s       not going to pay for early childhood education or solve any big social       ill…”              When Hickenlooper made that comment, in 2018, tax revenues from pot were       just under one percent of the state’s budget. Today that number is still       small — just over one percent.              Politicians often claim that not only will legalized pot kill the black       market but, by reaping tax revenue, the public will benefit.       Unfortunately, this is a scheme that works against itself and it is not       hard to understand why. Because legal pot is highly taxed the black market       always undercuts it and this simple fact helps it flourish. In Colorado       this has been grotesquely so.              On a bright May morning three years ago residents in suburban homes       throughout the Denver metro area awakened to hordes of local police and       state and federal agents scurrying through their neighborhoods. It was the       largest black-market marijuana bust in the state’s history.              Organized criminal gangs had quietly moved into upscale homes and hid       their indoor grow operations. Police seized 80,000 illegal plants and       4,500 pounds of finished marijuana, and they arrested 42 people.              Colorado had become “the epicenter of black-market marijuana in the United       States,” intoned a somber U.S. Attorney, Jason Dunn.              And this was five years after legalized pot was supposed to be eradicating       the black market for marijuana.              Over the years smaller illegal grow operations in homes around Colorado       have bedeviled local prosecutors and police agencies as people       persistently try to undercut the high prices of legalized pot and sell       directly to the growing customer base.              States that more recently legalized recreational pot, such as New York and       California, have come under pressure to lower pot taxes in the face of       aggressive and sophisticated black market sellers.              Legalizing pot, it seems, has had an unintended effect of allowing the       black market to flourish, not diminish.              More: Letters: Medical marijuana too costly to be truly effective              And, of course, the black market is only one problem brought on by       legalized marijuana. There are high social costs as well, such as       ingestion by children, lowered performance in school, lost jobs,       evictions, and the need for more addiction rehab.              As these problems began to manifest themselves in Colorado, a Denver think       tank, the Centennial Institute, tried to wrap its arms around the real       cost of legalizing marijuana in its first few years.              More: Bill to legalize marijuana in Ohio heads to lawmakers after hitting       signature requirements              Its study, “Economic and Social Costs of Legalized Marijuana,” was       released in 2018, and it concluded that for every dollar of tax income in       these first years, the state spent an astonishing $4.51 to rescue people       from the ill effects of legalized pot. The researchers acknowledged this       was an estimate only, but even if they are off the mark, the toll, when       fully counted, will be costly.              There is no tax bonanza here.              As Cranley announced his grandiose plan for spending pot revenues, he said       that “trying to criminalize and outlaw marijuana causes more harm than       good.”              Perhaps it does.              Just not for the criminals and the outlaws.              Tom Minnery is a board member of the Center for Christian Virtue in Ohio       and formerly senior vice president of public policy at Focus on the       Family, headquartered in Colorado .              This article originally appeared on The Columbus Dispatch: Has marijuana       worked for Colorado? Will John Cranley's pot plan work for Ohio              https://news.yahoo.com/smoke-pouring-holes-cranleys-plans-093801533.html              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca