Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.politics.marijuana    |    They hate government but love a pot-tax    |    2,468 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,333 of 2,468    |
|    useapen to All    |
|    California voters will decide whether to    |
|    19 Jul 23 08:15:45    |
      XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.society.liberalism, sac.politics       XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality       From: yourdime@outlook.com              Fifteen years ago, 52% of California voters approved Proposition 8, a ban       on same-sex marriage. Federal courts overturned the ban five years later       and the Supreme Court declared a constitutional right to same-sex marriage       in 2015, but now the state’s voters will decide whether to remove Prop. 8       from the books.              ACA5 by Assembly Member Evan Low, D-Sunnyvale, a proposed state       constitutional amendment to repeal Prop. 8, breezed through the state       Senate Thursday on a 31-0 vote and will be placed on the November 2024       ballot. Thirty Democrats voted for it along with Sen. Scott Wilk, R-Santa       Clarita (Los Angeles County). The Senate’s seven other Republicans       abstained or were absent.              “This proposed constitutional amendment removes this scar from the       California Constitution & affirms all Californians’ fundamental right to       marry,” Sen. Scott Wiener, D-San Francisco, a coauthor of ACA5, declared       on Twitter after the vote.              The ballot measure “gives us an opportunity to reflect the values of       everyday Californians and lead with love,” Low told The Chronicle after       introducing the measure in February.              Same-sex marriage in California was first prohibited by state lawmakers in       1977, a ban affirmed by the voters in a 2000 ballot initiative. The state       Supreme Court overturned the ban in a 4-3 ruling in May 2008, but it was       reinstated six months later by voter approval of Prop. 8, a state       constitutional amendment.              Gay-rights advocates challenged Prop. 8 in federal court, and after a       trial in San Francisco, Chief U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker declared       the measure unconstitutional in 2010. The Supreme Court upheld his ruling       in 2013 after state officials declined to appeal it, and ruled 5-4 two       years later that LGBTQ people nationwide had a constitutional right to       marry the partner of their choice, overturning marriage restrictions in 13       states.              The rulings mean Prop. 8 cannot be enforced. But it remains in the       California Constitution, and LGBTQ advocates fear it could become law       again if the increasingly conservative U.S. Supreme Court decides to       reconsider the issue — as Justice Clarence Thomas suggested in a       concurrence to last year’s ruling repealing the constitutional right to       abortion that the court had declared 49 years earlier.              Reach Bob Egelko: begelko@sfchronicle.com; Twitter: @BobEgelko              https://www.sfchronicle.com/politics/article/prop-8-removal-18199179.php              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca