Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.politics.marijuana    |    They hate government but love a pot-tax    |    2,468 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,348 of 2,468    |
|    useapen to All    |
|    Colorado voters reject Proposition HH, f    |
|    08 Nov 23 08:01:38    |
      XPost: co.politics, alt.fraud, misc.taxes       XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.guns       From: yourdime@outlook.com              Colorado voters on Tuesday soundly rejected Proposition HH, a complicated       tax and spending measure that would have provided hundreds of dollars in       property tax relief each year for the typical homeowner, while reducing       state taxpayers’ refunds and expanding state spending on schools.              As of 11:15 p.m., the measure was being rejected by 61% of voters. Voters       in just six counties — including Denver and Boulder — had supported for       its passage. The Associated Press called the race before 8 p.m.              The overwhelming rejection of the ballot measure was a major defeat for       Jared Polis, the state’s popular Democratic governor, who spent much of       the past year pushing unsuccessfully for policies that he said would       reduce housing costs across the state. His office authored Proposition HH,       which was referred to the ballot at the eleventh hour by Democrats in the       legislature. But the complex proposal never won over the enthusiastic       support of liberals, while Republicans remained staunchly opposed to the       measure and conservative groups spent millions to seek its defeat.              Conservatives celebrated Tuesday night at an Aurora sports bar, calling       the measure a victory for Colorado’s government-limiting Taxpayer’s Bill       of Rights.              “The message tonight is really simple: Government has enough money, live       within your budget,” former Gov. Bill Owens, a Republican, told the crowd.       “The only reason this was on the ballot was to do away with the TABOR       refund. That was the only reason.”              Proposition HH’s failure means Coloradans’ property tax bills could go up       as much as 40% on average next year without intervention by the General       Assembly or local officials. There’s little time to make changes before       local governments prepare their budgets and tax bills go out, so the       legislature and Polis will have to decide soon whether to take action.              They could call a special lawmaking term before the end of the year or       attempt to cut property tax rates when the legislature reconvenes in       January. Republicans on Tuesday renewed calls for Polis to convene a       special legislative session and have already put forth a number of broad       property tax relief proposals in anticipation of the measure’s failure.              “The governor needs to call a special session — do it tonight, do it       tomorrow, fix this property tax system immediately,” said Michael Fields,       the leader of Advance Colorado Action, a conservative group that       campaigned against the measure. “TABOR’s not going anywhere, and neither       are we.”              Polis, who was at the Western Governors Association meeting Tuesday night       in Jackson, Wyoming, issued a statement through a spokesperson.              “The governor thanks everyone who voted in this year’s election,” said       Conor Cahill, Polis’ press secretary. “While he is disappointed voters       didn’t pass a long-term property tax cut, he is currently considering next       steps.”              Also looming large is a measure authored by conservatives on the 2024       statewide ballot that would cap annual property tax increases statewide at       4%, limiting the amount of money collected by schools and other local       taxing authorities that rely on property tax revenue.              Some voters told The Colorado Sun they liked Proposition HH’s school       funding provisions or its property tax cuts. Others said it didn’t provide       enough cost savings to them personally, or that they didn’t want to cut       taxes at all. And on Election Day, supporters and opponents alike       expressed uncertainty — and confusion — about how the proposal would       actually work.              Patrick Garvey, a Democrat, said he was conflicted, but voted against       Proposition HH — “begrudgingly.”              “I feel like the issues within that proposition need to be isolated and       voted on separately because it’s confusing for the average person,” said       Garvey, who dropped off his ballot outside the Denver Botanic Gardens       early Tuesday afternoon.              The measure was unusually complex even for Colorado, a state with a long       tradition of asking voters to weigh in on complicated tax policy       questions.              Proposition HH would have provided relief from rising property taxes on       the one hand, by reducing the statewide residential assessment rate to       6.7% from 6.765% and expanding existing tax exemptions for homeowners.              On the other, it would have increased the state revenue cap under the       Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights by 1 percentage point a year for at least the       next 10 years. That would have reduced, or in some years even eliminated,       taxpayer refunds owed under TABOR in years of strong economic growth.              In a statement, Senate President Steve Fenberg, D-Boulder, said       Proposition HH was “about providing long-term tax relief for Colorado       seniors and families” without harming schools and other local services. He       blamed a “far right” misinformation campaign for the proposal’s defeat by       voters.              “It’s unclear tonight what the pathway forward is,” said Fenberg, who       chaired the campaign in favor of the measure, “but it’s clear the answer       is not Initiative 50 (the conservative tax cut measure), which would amend       the constitution to permanently reduce funding for schools, fire districts       and libraries.”              The change to the TABOR cap could have allowed the state government to       spend as much as $2.2 billion in additional tax revenue annually by 2032.       The vast majority of that money would have gone to K-12 schools.              The boost to education funding was what won the vote of Susan Katz, a       Boulder Democrat.              “We are totally open to paying more taxes, and we’re anxious for more       money to go to education,” Katz said. “We like what the governor did with       early childhood education (universal Pre-K) and we want to support him.”              But that message was largely missing from the campaign and from Polis       himself, who tried to pitch voters on tax relief first and foremost.              That pitch was lost on some renters like Garvey, who didn’t expect to       benefit from it. Chris Okere, a homeowner who cast his ballot in Boulder,       said he voted for it, but with misgivings.              “It’s all about property taxes,” said Okere, a politically unaffiliated       voter. “I didn’t think that it’s a great deal, but if we don’t do it, then       our property taxes will go up 30 to 40%.”              Some of Proposition HH’s provisions were temporary, like a one-year change       to the TABOR refund formula that would have given more to Coloradans who       make under $99,000 a year, while reducing refund checks for higher       earners.              The measure also would have provided some financial assistance to local       governments to compensate for reduced property tax revenue, but the state       aid was designed to be limited and fade over time. As a result, the              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca